Evidence for selection by male mating success in natural populations of Drosophila pseudoobscura
- PMID: 286338
- PMCID: PMC383286
- DOI: 10.1073/pnas.76.3.1519
Evidence for selection by male mating success in natural populations of Drosophila pseudoobscura
Abstract
Gene arrangement frequencies were determined at two stages in the life history of Drosophila pseudoobscura taken from nature. Three populations in the central highlands of Mexico were each sampled twice during 1976. Gene arrangement frequencies were measured in adult males and in larvae that were the offspring of females collected at the same time. The adult males were in all likelihood a representative sample of those who fathered the larvae produced by the wild females. Differences in gene arrangement frequency between these two life stages should indicate the operation of natural selection. One-third of our comparisons of common gene arrangement frequencies in males and in larvae from the next generation were statistically significant, as were one-third of our comparisons of total frequency arrays in the two life stages. We consider the components of selection that could produce such frequency changes and reason that male mating success must be the major one. Gene arrangement frequencies in the Mexican populations fluctuate within wide bounds. Selection must act to retain the polymorphism in the face of this flux in gene arrangement frequencies, and we suggest that male mating success plays an important role.
Similar articles
-
Rare male mating advantage in a natural population of Drosophila pseudoobscura.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988 Dec;85(24):9870-4. doi: 10.1073/pnas.85.24.9870. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988. PMID: 3200863 Free PMC article.
-
Relative effects of female fecundity and male mating success on fertility selection in Drosophila pseudoobscura.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 Apr 2;93(7):3080-2. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.7.3080. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996. PMID: 8610171 Free PMC article.
-
Mutual interest between the sexes and reproductive success in Drosophila pseudoobscura.Evolution. 2002 Dec;56(12):2537-40. doi: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2002.tb00178.x. Evolution. 2002. PMID: 12583593
-
Selection in natural and experimental populations of Drosophila pseudoobscura.Genome. 1989;31(1):239-45. doi: 10.1139/g89-041. Genome. 1989. PMID: 2687095 Review.
-
An integrative view of sexual selection in Tribolium flour beetles.Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2008 May;83(2):151-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-185X.2008.00037.x. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2008. PMID: 18429767 Review.
Cited by
-
Virility Deficiency and the Sex-Ratio Trait in DROSOPHILA PSEUDOOBSCURA. I. Sperm Displacement and Sexual Selection.Genetics. 1983 Nov;105(3):651-62. doi: 10.1093/genetics/105.3.651. Genetics. 1983. PMID: 17246170 Free PMC article.
-
A Test for Rare Male Mating Advantage with DROSOPHILA PSEUDOOBSCURA Karyotypes.Genetics. 1984 Aug;107(4):577-89. doi: 10.1093/genetics/107.4.577. Genetics. 1984. PMID: 17246224 Free PMC article.
-
Cytoplasmic incompatibility and mating preference in Colombian Drosophila pseudoobscura.Genetics. 1996 Jan;142(1):189-94. doi: 10.1093/genetics/142.1.189. Genetics. 1996. PMID: 8770596 Free PMC article.
-
Rare male mating advantage in a natural population of Drosophila pseudoobscura.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988 Dec;85(24):9870-4. doi: 10.1073/pnas.85.24.9870. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988. PMID: 3200863 Free PMC article.
-
Relative effects of female fecundity and male mating success on fertility selection in Drosophila pseudoobscura.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 Apr 2;93(7):3080-2. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.7.3080. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996. PMID: 8610171 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Molecular Biology Databases