Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Jun 21;12(6):e0179486.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0179486. eCollection 2017.

Validation study of the safety attitudes questionnaire (SAQ) in public hospitals of Heilongjiang province, China

Ying Li  1 , Xiaowen Zhao  2 , Xue Zhang  3 , Chi Zhang  4 , Hongkun Ma  5 , Mingli Jiao  1   6 , Xia Li  7 , Lijun Gao  8 , Mo Hao  9 , Jun Lv  9 , Yanming Zhao  10 , Yu Cui  8 , Jinghua Liu  11 , Zhaoquan Huang  12 , Wuxiang Shi  12 , Qunhong Wu  8 , Mei Yin  3
Affiliations

Validation study of the safety attitudes questionnaire (SAQ) in public hospitals of Heilongjiang province, China

Ying Li et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Purpose: The objective of this study was to validate the reliability and validity of the safety attitudes questionnaire (SAQ) in Heilongjiang province, northern China.

Methods: The SAQ was distributed to 27 public hospitals in five cities across Heilongjiang province. The Cronbach's α, item-dimension and dimension-dimension correlations were calculated. Descriptive analyses and confirmatory factor analysis were also performed.

Results: The recovery rate of the questionnaire was 84.45%. The validity and reliability measures of the SAQ were acceptable. The goodness-of-fit index from the confirmatory factor analysis showed a reasonable model fit (CFI = 0.93, GFI = 0.91, RMSEA = 0.05). The Cronbach's α value for the scale was 0.91 and ranged from 0.66 to 0.91 for each of the scales. The SAQ showed good internal consistency reliability.

Conclusion: The SAQ had satisfactory psychometric properties and could be a useful tool to measure safety attitudes in public hospitals in Heilongjiang province in China.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. De Vries EN, Ramrattan MA, Smorenburg SM, Gouma DJ, Boermeester MA. The incidence and nature of in-hospital adverse events: a systematic review. Quality & Safety in Health Care. 2008;17(3):216–223. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Huang DT, Clermont G, Kong L, Weissfeld LA, Sexton JB, Rowan KM, et al. Intensive care unit safety culture and outcomes: a US multicenter study. International Journal for Quality in Health Care. 2010;22(3):151–161. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzq017 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cooper JB, Gaba DM, Liang B, Woods D, Blum LN. The National Patient Safety Foundation agenda for research and development in patient safety. Medgenmed Medscape General Medicine. 2000;2(3):E38 - PubMed
    1. Kohn LT, Corrigan JM, Donaldson MS. Institute of Medicine). To err is human: building a safer health system. Annales Francaises D Anesthesie Et De Reanimation. 2000;7(Dec):245–246.
    1. Ostroff C, Kinicki AJ, Tamkins MM. Organizational Culture and Climate 2003. 565–593.

Publication types