Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Jun 21;12(6):e0179733.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0179733. eCollection 2017.

Measurement properties of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) used in adult patients with chronic kidney disease: A systematic review

Affiliations

Measurement properties of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) used in adult patients with chronic kidney disease: A systematic review

Olalekan Lee Aiyegbusi et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Background: Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) can provide valuable information which may assist with the care of patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). However, given the large number of measures available, it is unclear which PROMs are suitable for use in research or clinical practice. To address this we comprehensively evaluated studies that assessed the measurement properties of PROMs in adults with CKD.

Methods: Four databases were searched; reference list and citation searching of included studies was also conducted. The COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) checklist was used to appraise the methodological quality of the included studies and to inform a best evidence synthesis for each PROM.

Results: The search strategy retrieved 3,702 titles/abstracts. After 288 duplicates were removed, 3,414 abstracts were screened and 71 full-text articles were retrieved for further review. Of these, 24 full-text articles were excluded as they did not meet the eligibility criteria. Following reference list and citation searching, 19 articles were retrieved bringing the total number of papers included in the final analysis to 66. There was strong evidence supporting internal consistency and moderate evidence supporting construct validity for the Kidney Disease Quality of Life-36 (KDQOL-36) in pre-dialysis patients. In the dialysis population, the KDQOL-Short Form (KDQOL-SF) had strong evidence for internal consistency and structural validity and moderate evidence for test-retest reliability and construct validity while the KDQOL-36 had moderate evidence of internal consistency, test-retest reliability and construct validity. The End Stage Renal Disease-Symptom Checklist Transplantation Module (ESRD-SCLTM) demonstrated strong evidence for internal consistency and moderate evidence for test-retest reliability, structural and construct validity in renal transplant recipients.

Conclusions: We suggest considering the KDQOL-36 for use in pre-dialysis patients; the KDQOL-SF or KDQOL-36 for dialysis patients and the ESRD-SCLTM for use in transplant recipients. However, further research is required to evaluate the measurement error, structural validity, responsiveness and patient acceptability of PROMs used in CKD.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: OLA is funded by the Health Foundation’s PhD Awards for Improvement Science. DK is funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Fellowship. The views expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NHS, the National Institute for Health Research, Health Education England or the Department of Health. The funder had no role with respect to study design; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of data; writing of the report; and the decision to submit the report for publication. TM is partly funded by the NIHR through the Collaborations for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care for West Midlands (CLAHRC-WM). This paper presents independent research and the views expressed in this publication are not necessarily those of the NIHR, the Department of Health, NHS Partner Trusts, University of Birmingham or the CLAHRC-WM Management Group. AG is employed by Oxford Policy Management Ltd. TK is employed by PAREXEL International. MC reports grants from the NIHR, Macmillan Cancer Support, personal fees from Ferring and Astellas Pharma, outside the submitted work; and co-Chairs the International Society for Quality of Life Research Best Practices for PROs in Trials Taskforce. These affiliations do not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Flow diagram.

References

    1. Couser WG, Remuzzi G, Mendis S, Tonelli M. The contribution of chronic kidney disease to the global burden of major noncommunicable diseases. Kidney international. 2011;80(12):1258–70. Epub 2011/10/14. doi: 10.1038/ki.2011.368 . - DOI - PubMed
    1. Matsushita K, van der Velde M, Astor BC, Woodward M, Levey AS, de Jong PE, et al. Association of estimated glomerular filtration rate and albuminuria with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in general population cohorts: a collaborative meta-analysis. Lancet (London, England). 2010;375(9731):2073–81. Epub 2010/05/21. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(10)60674-5 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPmc3993088. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nitsch D, Grams M, Sang Y, Black C, Cirillo M, Djurdjev O, et al. Associations of estimated glomerular filtration rate and albuminuria with mortality and renal failure by sex: a meta-analysis. BMJ (Clinical research ed). 2013;346:f324 Epub 2013/01/31. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f324 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPmc3558410. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hill NR, Fatoba ST, Oke JL, Hirst JA, O'Callaghan CA, Lasserson DS, et al. Global Prevalence of Chronic Kidney Disease—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. PloS one. 2016;11(7):e0158765 Epub 2016/07/08. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0158765 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPmc4934905. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hamer RA, El Nahas AM. The burden of chronic kidney disease: Is rising rapidly worldwide. BMJ: British Medical Journal. 2006;332(7541):563–4. PMC1397782. doi: 10.1136/bmj.332.7541.563 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types