Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2017 Jun 7:8:76.
doi: 10.3389/fgene.2017.00076. eCollection 2017.

DNA Methylation, Nuclear Organization, and Cancer

Affiliations
Review

DNA Methylation, Nuclear Organization, and Cancer

Bhavani P Madakashira et al. Front Genet. .

Abstract

The dramatic re-organization of the cancer cell nucleus creates telltale morphological features critical for pathological staging of tumors. In addition, the changes to the mutational and epigenetic landscape in cancer cells alter the structure and stability of the genome and directly contribute to malignancy. DNA methylation is one of the best studied epigenetic changes in cancer, as nearly every type of cancer studied shows a loss of DNA methylation spread across most of the genome. This global hypomethylation is accompanied by hypermethylation at distinct loci, and much of the work on DNA methylation in cancer has focused on how local changes contribute to gene expression. However, the emerging picture is that the changes to DNA methylation in cancer cells has little direct effect on gene expression but instead impacts the organization of the genome in the nucleus. Several recent studies that take a broad view of the cancer epigenome find that the most profound changes to the cancer methylome are spread across large segments of the genome, and that the focal changes are reflective of a whole reorganization of epigenome. Hallmarks of nuclear reorganization in cancer are found in the long regions of chromatin marked by histone methylation (LOCKs) and nuclear lamina interactions (LADs). In this review, we focus on a novel perspective that DNA methylation changes in cancer impact the global structure of heterochromatin, LADs and LOCKs, and how these global changes, in turn, contribute to gene expression changes and genomic stability.

Keywords: DNA methylation; Large Organized Chromatin Lysine Modifications (LOCKS); cancer; chromatin; lads.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
DNA methylation is dynamically altered in cancer cells compared to the normal cells. DNA methylation in a region of chromosome 11 between Lymphoblastoid cells (GM12878) and Leukemia cells (K562) shows regions of partially methylated domains (PMD) in the cancer cells, where the methylation levels flatten at around 50% over the region compared to the DNA methylation of the same region in the control sample. There are also regions which do not show any methylation differences (Static) and a DNA block with hypermethylation in the cancer cells. Ref Seq Genes in the region are represented as blue lines below the histogram. This figure was generated using the data from the Epigenome browser of the Roadmap Epigenomics Project (http://epigenomegateway.wustl. edu/browser/).
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Chromatin rearrangement in the cancer nuclei. In normal differentiated cells, heterochromatin is organized in the nuclear periphery by binding to the nuclear lamina proteins (in blue) and is organized into LADs (red) which overlap significantly with LOCKs (H3K9me2/3 and H3K27me3-green and gray circles). The active domains are tagged by the euchromatin histone marks (pink circles). Cancer cells display nuclear chromatin rearrangement with decreased lamin expression in the lamina, increased euchromatinization, and significant loss of LADs and LOCKs. In cancer, large blocks of DNA termed PMDs (black boxes) coincide to a large extent with LADs and LOCKs. These events can ultimately lead to random DNA recombination events as well as the less stable open chromatin are hotspots for DNA breaks (black dashed lines) (Kind et al., 2013; Luperchio et al., 2014; Feinberg et al., 2016).

References

    1. Achinger-Kawecka J., Clark S. J. (2017). Disruption of the 3D cancer genome blueprint. Epigenomics 9 47–55. 10.2217/epi-2016-0111 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Amendola M., van Steensel B. (2015). Nuclear lamins are not required for lamina-associated domain organization in mouse embryonic stem cells. EMBO Rep. 16 610–617. 10.15252/embr.201439789 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Baylin S. B., Jones P. A. (2011). A decade of exploring the cancer epigenome – biological and translational implications. Nat. Rev. Cancer 11 726–734. 10.1038/nrc3130 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Berman B. P., Weisenberger D. J., Aman J. F., Hinoue T., Ramjan Z., Liu Y., et al. (2011). Regions of focal DNA hypermethylation and long-range hypomethylation in colorectal cancer coincide with nuclear lamina–associated domains. Nat. Genet. 44 40–46. 10.1038/ng.969 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Burke B., Stewart C. L. (2013). The nuclear lamins: flexibility in function. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 14 13–24. 10.1038/nrm3488 - DOI - PubMed