Assessment of physical performance and quality of life in kidney-transplanted patients: a cross-sectional study

Abstract

Background: Information on physical and mental wellness in renal transplantation is limited. Therefore, we performed a cross-sectional study to evaluate and describe the different components of physical performance and quality of life (QoL) in a cohort of kidney-transplanted patients.

Methods: Physical performance and QoL were determined through the administration of validated tests and questionnaires [muscle strength, dynamometer handgrip, tactile sensitivity, visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain, Timed Up and Go (TUG) test, Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) and the 36-item Short Form Health Survey]. The patients were divided into three groups based on time elapsed since transplantation: early (in the first 6 months), middle (from 7 to 60 months) and late (>60 months).

Results: Of 132 enrolled patients, 11 patients (8.3%) presented a severe reduction of muscle strength, 63 patients (47%) had significant bilateral impaired handgrip and tactile sensitivity was altered in 23 patients (17.4%). TUG assessment showed significant mobility limitation in 29 patients (21.9%). The FSS presented a pathological value in 50 patients (37.3%), while the mean VAS was 1.8 ± 2.7. There were no significant differences in physical performance parameters among the three patient groups. There were inverse correlations among different components of physical performance and age, comorbidity and dialysis vintage, and there was a direct correlation with renal function. During the first months after transplantation there were limitations in physical, social and emotional activities. Overall, the self-perceived physical performance was significantly lower in transplanted patients with respect to the normal reference level.

Conclusion: Kidney-transplanted patients may present different degrees of impairment in physical performance and quality of life. Systematic functional assessment is essential to identify patients needing intensive and personalized rehabilitation programmes.

Keywords: kidney transplantation; physical and rehabilitation medicine; quality of life.

Fig. 1.

Prevalence of normal functional (on x-axis) indices for the entire population (upper left panel) and according to short (upper right), middle (lower left) and long (lower right) time elapsed since transplantation. Whiskers represent 95% CI; dots represent prevalence.