Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2017 Jun 10;8(3):190-202.
doi: 10.5306/wjco.v8.i3.190.

Multidisciplinary approach of colorectal cancer liver metastases

Affiliations
Review

Multidisciplinary approach of colorectal cancer liver metastases

Giammaria Fiorentini et al. World J Clin Oncol. .

Abstract

Large bowel cancer is a worldwide public health challenge. More than one third of patients present an advanced stage of disease at diagnosis and the liver is the most common site of metastases. Selection criteria for early diagnosis, chemotherapy and surgery have been recently expanded. The definition of resectability remains unclear. The presence of metastases is the most significant prognostic factor. For this reason the surgical resection of hepatic metastases is the leading treatment. The most appropriate resection approach remains to be defined. The two step and simultaneous resection processes of both primary and metastases have comparable survival long-term outcomes. The advent of targeted biological chemotherapeutic agents and the development of loco-regional therapies (chemoembolization, thermal ablation, arterial infusion chemotherapy) contribute to extend favorable results. Standardized evidence-based protocols are missing, hence optimal management of hepatic metastases should be single patient tailored and decided by a multidisciplinary team. This article reviews the outcomes of resection, systemic and loco-regional therapies of liver metastases originating from large bowel cancer.

Keywords: Arterial infusion chemotherapy; Chemoembolization; Chemotherapy; Colorectal cancer; Colorectal cancer liver metastases; Hepatic resection; Liver metastases; Radioembolization.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict-of-interest statement: Authors declare no conflict of interests for this article.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Treatment indications for fit and unfit colorectal cancer liver metastases patients. BSC: Best supportive care; CHT: Chemotherapy; EGFR: Epidermal growth factor receptors agents; mut: Mutated; FP: Fluoro pyrimidine. Adapted from ESMO 2016[110].
Figure 2
Figure 2
Liver directed treatments. TACE: Trans-arterial chemoembolization.

References

    1. World Health Organization. International Agency for Research in Cancer. Globocan 2012 estimated cancer incidence, mortality and prevalence worldwide 2012. [accessed 2016 Aug 20] Available from: http://globocan.iarc.fr/Pages/fact_sheets_population.aspx.
    1. Zhang YL, Zhang ZS, Wu BP, Zhou DY. Early diagnosis for colorectal cancer in China. World J Gastroenterol. 2002;8:21–25. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Renehan AG, Egger M, Saunders MP, O’Dwyer ST. Impact on survival of intensive follow up after curative resection for colorectal cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials. BMJ. 2002;324:813. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Simmonds PC, Primrose JN, Colquitt JL, Garden OJ, Poston GJ, Rees M. Surgical resection of hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer: a systematic review of published studies. Br J Cancer. 2006;94:982–999. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pawlik TM, Schulick RD, Choti MA. Expanding criteria for resectability of colorectal liver metastases. Oncologist. 2008;13:51–64. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources