Reporting of imaging diagnostic accuracy studies with focus on MRI subgroup: Adherence to STARD 2015
- PMID: 28640484
- DOI: 10.1002/jmri.25797
Reporting of imaging diagnostic accuracy studies with focus on MRI subgroup: Adherence to STARD 2015
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate adherence of diagnostic accuracy studies in imaging journals to the STAndards for Reporting of Diagnostic accuracy studies (STARD) 2015. The secondary objective was to identify differences in reporting for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies.
Materials and methods: MEDLINE was searched for diagnostic accuracy studies published in imaging journals in 2016. Studies were evaluated for adherence to STARD 2015 (30 items, including expanded imaging specific subitems). Evaluation for differences in STARD adherence based on modality, impact factor, journal STARD adoption, country, subspecialty area, study design, and journal was performed.
Results: Adherence (n = 142 studies) was 55% (16.6/30 items, SD = 2.2). Index test description (including imaging-specific subitems) and interpretation were frequently reported (>66% of studies); no important differences in reporting of individual items were identified for studies on MRI. Infrequently reported items (<33% of studies) included some critical to generalizability (study setting and location) and assessment of bias (blinding of assessor of reference standard). New STARD 2015 items: sample size calculation, protocol reporting, and registration were infrequently reported. Higher impact factor (IF) journals reported more items than lower IF journals (17.2 vs. 16 items; P = 0.001). STARD adopter journals reported more items than nonadopters (17.5 vs. 16.4 items; P = 0.01). Adherence varied between journals (P = 0.003). No variability for study design (P = 0.32), subspecialty area (P = 0.75), country (P = 0.28), or imaging modality (P = 0.80) was identified.
Conclusion: Imaging accuracy studies show moderate adherence to STARD 2015, with only minor differences for studies evaluating MRI. This baseline evaluation will guide targeted interventions towards identified deficiencies and help track progress in reporting.
Level of evidence: 1 Technical Efficacy: Stage 2 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2018;47:523-544.
Keywords: STARD; guidelines; reporting; risk of bias.
© 2017 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.
Similar articles
-
Adherence to the Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy (STARD) 2015 Guidelines in Acute Point-of-Care Ultrasound Research.JAMA Netw Open. 2020 May 1;3(5):e203871. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.3871. JAMA Netw Open. 2020. PMID: 32356885 Free PMC article.
-
Assessment of Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy (STARD) 2015 guideline adherence in medical imaging diagnostic accuracy studies published in 2023.J Clin Epidemiol. 2025 Mar;179:111654. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2024.111654. Epub 2024 Dec 27. J Clin Epidemiol. 2025. PMID: 39733974
-
Evaluation of Imaging Research Adherence to the STARD 2015 Reporting Guideline: Update 9 Years After Implementation and Baseline Assessment.Can Assoc Radiol J. 2025 Mar 16:8465371251324090. doi: 10.1177/08465371251324090. Online ahead of print. Can Assoc Radiol J. 2025. PMID: 40091202
-
Diagnostic accuracy research in glaucoma is still incompletely reported: An application of Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (STARD) 2015.PLoS One. 2017 Dec 14;12(12):e0189716. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0189716. eCollection 2017. PLoS One. 2017. PMID: 29240827 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of adherence to STARD for abstracts in a diverse sample of diagnostic accuracy abstracts published in 2012 and 2019 reveals suboptimal reporting practices.J Clin Epidemiol. 2024 Sep;173:111459. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2024.111459. Epub 2024 Jul 14. J Clin Epidemiol. 2024. PMID: 39004321
Cited by
-
Thoracic imaging tests for the diagnosis of COVID-19.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 16;5(5):CD013639. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013639.pub5. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022. PMID: 35575286 Free PMC article.
-
Portable stroke detection devices: a systematic scoping review of prehospital applications.BMC Emerg Med. 2022 Jun 16;22(1):111. doi: 10.1186/s12873-022-00663-z. BMC Emerg Med. 2022. PMID: 35710360 Free PMC article.
-
Thoracic imaging tests for the diagnosis of COVID-19.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Mar 16;3(3):CD013639. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013639.pub4. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 16;5:CD013639. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013639.pub5. PMID: 33724443 Free PMC article. Updated.
-
Adherence to STARD guidelines in miRNA diagnostic accuracy studies for hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review.BMC Med Res Methodol. 2025 Jun 6;25(1):155. doi: 10.1186/s12874-025-02610-5. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2025. PMID: 40481407 Free PMC article.
-
Is There Evidence of P-Hacking in Imaging Research?Can Assoc Radiol J. 2023 Aug;74(3):497-507. doi: 10.1177/08465371221139418. Epub 2022 Nov 22. Can Assoc Radiol J. 2023. PMID: 36412994 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous