Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2017 Jun 22;12(6):e0179600.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0179600. eCollection 2017.

Is self-assessment of medical abortion using a low-sensitivity pregnancy test combined with a checklist and phone text messages feasible in South African primary healthcare settings? A randomized trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Is self-assessment of medical abortion using a low-sensitivity pregnancy test combined with a checklist and phone text messages feasible in South African primary healthcare settings? A randomized trial

Deborah Constant et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate feasibility of self-assessment of medical abortion outcome using a low-sensitivity urine pregnancy test, checklist and text messages. The study assessed whether accurate self-assessment required a demonstration of the low-sensitivity urine pregnancy test or if verbal instructions suffice.

Methods: This non-inferiority trial enrolled 525 adult women from six public sector abortion clinics. Eligible women were undergoing medical abortion at gestations within 63 days. Consenting women completed a baseline interview, received standard care with mifepristone and home-administration of misoprostol. All were given a low-sensitivity urine pregnancy test and checklist for use 14 days later, sent text reminders, and asked to attend in-clinic follow-up after two weeks. Women were randomly assigned 1:1 to an instruction-only group (n = 262; issued with pre-scripted instructions on the low-sensitivity pregnancy test), or a demonstration group (n = 263; performed practice tests guided by lay health workers). The primary outcome was accurate self-assessment of incomplete abortion, defined as needing additional misoprostol or vacuum aspiration. Analysis was by intention to treat and a non-inferiority margin was set to six percentage points. Women's acceptability of their abortion procedure and preferences for follow-up were also assessed.

Results: Follow-up was 81% for abortion outcome, confirmed in-clinic at two weeks or self-reported within six months. Non-inferiority of instruction-only to a demonstration was inconclusive for accurate self-assessment (risk difference for instruction-only -demonstration: -2.5%; 95%CI: -9% to 4%). Comparing instruction-only to demonstration groups, 99% and 100% found the pregnancy test easy to do; and 91% and 93% respectively chose the pregnancy test, checklist and text messages for abortion outcome assessment in the future.

Conclusion: Routine self-assessment using a low-sensitivity pregnancy test, checklist and text messages is feasible and preferred by women attending South African primary care abortion clinics. Counselling with additional emphasis on prompt recognition of ongoing pregnancies is recommended.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02231619.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: I have read the journal's policy and the authors of this manuscript have the following competing interests: Exelgyn donated the pregnancy tests but played no role whatsoever in the study design, execution, analysis or preparation of this manuscript. K Gemzell-Danielsson has received honorarium as an advisory board member and/or invited speaker at Exelgyn and participated in clinical trials conducted by Sun Pharma. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Trial profile.
(A)Women returned to the clinic, but the provider was not present. In final FU phone contact abortion outcome was self-reported. (B)Women returned to the clinic, but the provider was not present. Final FU phone contact was unsuccessful and abortion outcome could not be confirmed. (C)Women did not return to the clinic, FU at 14 days was by phone. Final FU phone contact was unsuccessful and abortion outcome could not be confirmed.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Observed difference (95% CI) between study groups for accurate self-assessment.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. WCDOH. Provinical Policy Standardized Guidelines and Protocols on the Termination of Pregnancy Services. Cape Town, South Africa: Western Cape Department of Health; 2010.
    1. Raymond EG, Shannon C, Weaver MA, Winikoff B. First-trimester medical abortion with mifepristone 200 mg and misoprostol: a systematic review. Contraception. 2013;87(1):26–37. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2012.06.011 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Iyengar K, Paul M, Iyengar SD, Klingberg-Allvin M, Essén B, Bring J, et al. Self-assessment of the outcome of early medical abortion versus clinic follow-up in India: a randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial. Lancet Global Health. 2015;3(9):e537–e45. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(15)00150-3 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cameron ST, Glasier A, Johnstone A, Dewart H, Campbell A. Can women determine the success of early medical termination of pregnancy themselves? Contraception. 2015;91(1):6–11. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2014.09.009 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Oppegaard KS, Qvigstad E, Fiala C, Heikinheimo O, Benson L, Gemzell-Danielsson K. Clinical follow-up compared with self-assessment of outcome after medical abortion: a multicentre, non-inferiority, randomised, controlled trial. Lancet. 2014;385(9969):698–704. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61054-0 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data