Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2017 Oct;21(9):1528-1537.
doi: 10.1002/ejp.1054. Epub 2017 Jun 22.

A phase III randomized controlled study on the efficacy and improved bowel function of prolonged-release (PR) oxycodone-naloxone (up to 160/80 mg daily) vs oxycodone PR

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

A phase III randomized controlled study on the efficacy and improved bowel function of prolonged-release (PR) oxycodone-naloxone (up to 160/80 mg daily) vs oxycodone PR

D Dupoiron et al. Eur J Pain. 2017 Oct.

Abstract

Background: Oxycodone/naloxone (OXN PR) is a prolonged-release formulation containing oxycodone and naloxone in a 2:1 ratio. This study aimed to evaluate the tolerability and efficacy of doses up to OXN160/80 mg PR compared with oxycodone prolonged-release formulation (OxyPR) in a randomised controlled trial.

Methods: Two hundred and forty-three patients were randomised to treatment with OXN PR (n = 123) or OxyPR (n = 120) during the 5-week double-blind study. Measured were: opioid-induced constipation [bowel function index score (BFI)]; analgesic efficacy (NRS 0-10); daily laxative rescue medication use; rescue medication use, and the number of complete spontaneous bowel movements (CSBMs) per week. A subanalysis was conducted in cancer patients.

Results: Greater reductions in mean BFI scores were reported for the OXN PR group compared with OxyPR from Week 1 onwards; at Week 5 the mean change from baseline was -32.5 versus -14.2. Average 24-h pain scores were low and remained stable in the range 3-4 in both treatment groups. Analgesic rescue medication use was similar between the groups. Patients receiving OXN PR used significantly lower mean daily doses of laxative rescue medication than those receiving OxyPR (P = 0.006). The number of CSBM in the OXN PR group approximately doubled compared with a 25% decrease in the OxyPR group. Comparable results to the total study population were reported in the cancer patient subgroup.

Conclusions: OXN PR in daily doses of up to 160/80 mg significantly improves bowel function compared with equivalent doses of OxyPR while still providing comparable analgesic efficacy.

Significance: Effective analgesia can be achieved using oxycodone/naloxone PR up to 160/80 mg daily without compromising bowel function. A similar outcome was reported in cancer and non-cancer patients.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study design.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Consort flow diagram.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Bowel Function Index in Full Analysis Populations: (A) total study group; and (B) cancer subgroups.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Pain scores: (A) total study group; and (B) cancer subgroups.

Comment in

References

    1. Abramowitz, L. , Béziaud, N. , Labreze, L. , Giardina, V. , Caussé, C. , Chuberre, B. , Allaert, F.A. , Perrot, S. (2013). Prevalence and impact of constipation and bowel dysfunction induced by strong opioids: A cross‐sectional survey of 520 patients with cancer pain: DYONISOS study. J Med Econ 16, 1423–1433. - PubMed
    1. Cherny, N. , Ripamonti, C. , Pereira, J. , Davis, C. , Fallon, M. et al. (2001). Strategies to manage the adverse effects of oral morphine: An evidence‐based report. J Clin Oncol 19, 2542–2554. - PubMed
    1. De Schepper, H.U. , Cremonini, F. , Park, M.I. , Camilleri, M. (2004). Opioids and the gut: Pharmacology and current clinical experience. Neurogastroenterol Motil 16, 383–394. - PubMed
    1. Fishman, J. , Roffwarg, H. , Hellman, L. (1973). Disposition of naloxone‐7,8‐3H in normal and narcotic dependent men. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 187, 575–580. - PubMed
    1. Linn, A.J. , Steinbrook, R.A. (2007). Peripherally restricted mu‐opioid receptor antagonists: A review. Tech Reg Anesthes Pain Manage 11, 27–32.

Publication types

MeSH terms