A phase III randomized controlled study on the efficacy and improved bowel function of prolonged-release (PR) oxycodone-naloxone (up to 160/80 mg daily) vs oxycodone PR
- PMID: 28641363
- PMCID: PMC5600007
- DOI: 10.1002/ejp.1054
A phase III randomized controlled study on the efficacy and improved bowel function of prolonged-release (PR) oxycodone-naloxone (up to 160/80 mg daily) vs oxycodone PR
Abstract
Background: Oxycodone/naloxone (OXN PR) is a prolonged-release formulation containing oxycodone and naloxone in a 2:1 ratio. This study aimed to evaluate the tolerability and efficacy of doses up to OXN160/80 mg PR compared with oxycodone prolonged-release formulation (OxyPR) in a randomised controlled trial.
Methods: Two hundred and forty-three patients were randomised to treatment with OXN PR (n = 123) or OxyPR (n = 120) during the 5-week double-blind study. Measured were: opioid-induced constipation [bowel function index score (BFI)]; analgesic efficacy (NRS 0-10); daily laxative rescue medication use; rescue medication use, and the number of complete spontaneous bowel movements (CSBMs) per week. A subanalysis was conducted in cancer patients.
Results: Greater reductions in mean BFI scores were reported for the OXN PR group compared with OxyPR from Week 1 onwards; at Week 5 the mean change from baseline was -32.5 versus -14.2. Average 24-h pain scores were low and remained stable in the range 3-4 in both treatment groups. Analgesic rescue medication use was similar between the groups. Patients receiving OXN PR used significantly lower mean daily doses of laxative rescue medication than those receiving OxyPR (P = 0.006). The number of CSBM in the OXN PR group approximately doubled compared with a 25% decrease in the OxyPR group. Comparable results to the total study population were reported in the cancer patient subgroup.
Conclusions: OXN PR in daily doses of up to 160/80 mg significantly improves bowel function compared with equivalent doses of OxyPR while still providing comparable analgesic efficacy.
Significance: Effective analgesia can be achieved using oxycodone/naloxone PR up to 160/80 mg daily without compromising bowel function. A similar outcome was reported in cancer and non-cancer patients.
© 2017 The Authors. European Journal of Pain published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Pain Federation - EFIC®.
Figures
Comment in
-
Comment on a paper by Dupoiron et al. "A phase III randomized controlled study on the efficacy and improved bowel function of prolonged-release (PR) oxycodone- naloxone (up to 160/80 mg daily) versus oxycodone PR".Eur J Pain. 2017 Nov;21(10):1772-1773. doi: 10.1002/ejp.1098. Eur J Pain. 2017. PMID: 28990731 No abstract available.
-
Authors' reply to the comment by Patel J, Martin JH and Lucas CJ.Eur J Pain. 2018 Jan;22(1):203-204. doi: 10.1002/ejp.1142. Eur J Pain. 2018. PMID: 29239522 No abstract available.
References
-
- Abramowitz, L. , Béziaud, N. , Labreze, L. , Giardina, V. , Caussé, C. , Chuberre, B. , Allaert, F.A. , Perrot, S. (2013). Prevalence and impact of constipation and bowel dysfunction induced by strong opioids: A cross‐sectional survey of 520 patients with cancer pain: DYONISOS study. J Med Econ 16, 1423–1433. - PubMed
-
- Cherny, N. , Ripamonti, C. , Pereira, J. , Davis, C. , Fallon, M. et al. (2001). Strategies to manage the adverse effects of oral morphine: An evidence‐based report. J Clin Oncol 19, 2542–2554. - PubMed
-
- De Schepper, H.U. , Cremonini, F. , Park, M.I. , Camilleri, M. (2004). Opioids and the gut: Pharmacology and current clinical experience. Neurogastroenterol Motil 16, 383–394. - PubMed
-
- Fishman, J. , Roffwarg, H. , Hellman, L. (1973). Disposition of naloxone‐7,8‐3H in normal and narcotic dependent men. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 187, 575–580. - PubMed
-
- Linn, A.J. , Steinbrook, R.A. (2007). Peripherally restricted mu‐opioid receptor antagonists: A review. Tech Reg Anesthes Pain Manage 11, 27–32.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials
