Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Apr-Jun;30(2):221-231.
doi: 10.1016/j.jht.2017.05.003.

Shoulder proprioception: How is it measured and is it reliable? A systematic review

Amanda L Ager  1 , Jean-Sébastien Roy  2 , Marianne Roos  2 , Amélie Fournier Belley  2 , Ann Cools  3 , Luc J Hébert  4
Affiliations

Shoulder proprioception: How is it measured and is it reliable? A systematic review

Amanda L Ager et al. J Hand Ther. 2017 Apr-Jun.

Abstract

Study design: Systematic review.

Introduction: Constituents of proprioception include our awareness of the position (joint position sense [JPS]) and motion (kinesthesia) of our limbs in space. Proprioceptive deficits are associated with musculoskeletal disorders but remain a challenge to quantify, particularly at the shoulder.

Purpose of the study: To report the psychometric values of validity, reliability, and responsiveness for shoulder JPS and/or kinesthesia protocols.

Methods: A review of 5 databases was conducted from inception to July 2016 for studies reporting a psychometric property of a shoulder proprioception protocol. The included studies were evaluated using the QualSyst checklist and COSMIN 4-point scale.

Results: Twenty-one studies were included, yielding 407 participants and 553 evaluated shoulders (n). The included studies support excellent methodological scores using the QualSyst checklist (88.1 ± 9.9%) and good psychometric scores with the COSMIN for reliability (71.1%) and moderate-to-low quality score (50%) for criterion validity. Weighted average intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) for intrarater reliability were highest for passive JPS and kinesthesia, ICC = 0.92 ± 0.07 (n = 214) and ICC = 0.92 ± 0.04 (n = 74), respectively. The most reliable movement and tool are internal rotation at 90° of abduction, ICC = 0.88 ± 0.01 (n = 53), and the dynamometer, ICC = 0.92 ± 0.88 (n = 225). Only 2 studies quantify an aspect of validity and no responsiveness indices were reported among the included studies.

Conclusion: Based on the results of the included studies, the evaluation of shoulder proprioception is most reliable when using a passive protocol with an isokinetic dynamometer for internal rotation at 90° of shoulder abduction. Standardized protocols addressing the psychometric properties of shoulder proprioception measures are needed.

Level of evidence: Level 1a: systematic review.

Keywords: Joint position sense; Kinesthesia; Proprioception; Psychometric properties; Reliability; Shoulder; Systematic review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types