Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2017 Aug:176:60-65.
doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2017.06.005. Epub 2017 Jun 19.

Current state of the art for cardiac arrhythmia gene therapy

Affiliations
Review

Current state of the art for cardiac arrhythmia gene therapy

J Kevin Donahue. Pharmacol Ther. 2017 Aug.

Abstract

Cardiac arrhythmias are a leading cause of morbidity and mortality. Currently available therapeutic options lack sufficient efficacy and safety. Gene therapy has been proposed for treatment of cardiac arrhythmias. This review will discuss the current state of development for arrhythmia gene therapy. So far, all published studies are short-term, proof-of-concept animal studies. Potential replacement of cardiac pacemakers has been shown for combination gene therapy using the HCN2 gene and either the gene for adenylate cyclase, the skeletal muscle isoform of the sodium channel, or a dominant negative mutant of the potassium channel responsible for resting membrane potential. Atrial fibrillation has been prevented by gene transfer of either a dominant negative mutant of a repolarizing potassium channel, a gap junction, or an siRNA directed against caspase 3. Inherited arrhythmia syndromes have been corrected by replacement of the causative genes. Post-infarct ventricular tachycardia has been reduced by gene therapy with the skeletal muscle sodium channel and connexins and eliminated with the dominant negative mutant of the potassium channel responsible for resting membrane potential. These ideas show considerable promise. Long-term efficacy and safety studies are required to see if they can become viable therapies.

Keywords: Arrhythmia; Atrial fibrillation; Gene therapy; Gene transfer; Sinus node dysfunction; Ventricular tachycardia.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest statement: The author is an inventor on gene therapy intellectual property assigned to Johns Hopkins University. The author is a co-founder of Rithim Biologics, Inc., a gene therapy company with interests in post-operative atrial fibrillation.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Arrhythmia mechanisms (A) the normal morphologies of atrial (left) and ventricular (right) action potentials are shown. Normally, cardiac myocytes outside the specialized conduction system are quiescent and the cell maintains a polarized state with a stable negative resting membrane potential (baseline). (B) Unlike the stable baseline of normal myocytes, cells with automaticity (either cells from the specialized conduction system, cells modified to develop automaticity, or injured myocytes) have an unstable baseline with gradual depolarization. The slow rate of depolarization generally inactivated the sodium current that is responsible for the rapid depolarization noted for atrial and ventricular myocytes in panel A. A calcium current is generally responsible for activation in automatic cells. The slower kinetics of the calcium current account for the less sharp depolarization in comparison to normal atrial and ventricular myocytes. (C) Triggered arrhythmias are generated from secondary electrical activation of the cardiac myocyte, either in the later stages of the initial action potential (early afterdepolarization, depicted on the left) or after completion of the prior action potential (delayed afterdepolarization, right panel). Activations can either be small shifts in membrane potential (red line) or full secondary action potentials (orange dotted line). Afterdepolarizations are generally triggered by abnormal behavior of the cellular ionic currents and/or intracellular calcium handling processes. (D) Unlike the automaticity and triggered activity that are largely cellular processes, reentry is a tissue level process. Fixed or functional barriers (black bars) allow progressive activation of the loop of tissue inside the barrier. In the schematic, the active electrical wavefront is the white bar. The progression of red-orange-yellow-green-blue-violet represents the tissue in various stages of electrical recovery from the prior action potential, and the gray region is myocardial tissue that has recovered from the prior action potential and is capable of generating a new action potential when activated. The dotted arrow shows progression of the activation wavefront around the reentrant circuit, and the solid arrows show escape of the electrical activation to surrounding tissues. A heart beat is generated for each revolution of the circuit. Reentry can be disrupted when the activation wavefront meets refractory tissue (i.e. no gray region. This occurs either with increased speed of conduction around the circuit or with a delay in electrical recovery of cells within the circuit.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. AFFIRM First Antiarrhythmic Drug Substudy Investigators. Maintenance of sinus rhythm in patients with atrial fibrillation: an AFFIRM substudy of the first antiarrhythmic drug. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2003;42:20–29. - PubMed
    1. Amit G, Kikuchi K, Greener ID, Yang L, Novack V, Donahue JK. Selective molecular potassium channel blockade prevents atrial fibrillation. Circulation. 2010;121:2263–2270. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bayer. Betapace AF (sotalol HCl) [package insert] Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals; Wayne, NJ: 2011.
    1. Benjamin EJ, Chen PS, Bild DE, Mascette AM, Albert CM, Alonso A, Calkins H, Connolly SJ, Curtis AB, Darbar D, Ellinor PT, Go AS, Goldschlager NF, Heckbert SR, Jalife J, Kerr CR, Levy D, Lloyd-Jones DM, Massie BM, Nattel S, Olgin JE, Packer DL, Po SS, Tsang TS, Van Wagoner DR, Waldo AL, Wyse DG. Prevention of atrial fibrillation: report from a national heart, lung, and blood institute workshop. Circulation. 2009;119:606–618. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bernstein A, Parsonnet V. Survey of cardiac pacing and implanted defibrillator practice patterns in the United States in 1997. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2001;24:842–855. - PubMed