Off-resonance based assessment of metallic wear debris near total hip arthroplasty
- PMID: 28643347
- PMCID: PMC5741538
- DOI: 10.1002/mrm.26807
Off-resonance based assessment of metallic wear debris near total hip arthroplasty
Abstract
Purpose: The presence of metallic debris near total hip arthroplasty can have a significant impact on longitudinal patient management. Methods for magnetic resonance imaging-based quantification of metallic debris near painful total hip replacements are described and applied to cohorts of symptomatic and control subject cases.
Methods: A combination of metal artifact reduction, off-resonance mapping, off-resonance background removal, and spatial clustering methods are utilized to quantify off-resonance signatures in cases of suspected metallosis. These methods are applied to a cohort of symptomatic hip arthroplasties composed of cobalt-chromium alloys. Magnetostatic simulations and theoretical principles are used to illuminate the potential sources of the measured off-resonance effects. Reported metrics from histological tissue assays extracted during surgical revision procedures are also correlated with the proposed magnetic resonance imaging-based quantification results.
Results: The presented methods identified quantifiable metallosis signatures in more than 70% of the symptomatic and none of the control cases. Preliminary correlations of the MR data with direct histological evaluation of retrieved tissue samples indicate that the observed off-resonance effect may be related to tissue necrosis.
Conclusions: Magnetostatic simulations, theoretical principles, and preliminary histological trends suggest that disassociated cobalt is the source of the observed off-resonance signature. Magn Reson Med 79:1628-1637, 2018. © 2017 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.
Keywords: metal implants; metallosis; susceptibility quantification; total hip arthroplasty.
© 2017 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.
Figures
References
-
- HCUPnet. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. [Accessed: Accessed 24 March, 2016];HCUPnet, Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project. 2016 http://hcupnet.ahrq.gov.
-
- Labek G, Thaler M, Janda W, Agreiter M, Stöckl B. Revision rates after total joint replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011;933:293–297. - PubMed
-
- Kurtz S, Mowat F, Ong K, Chan N, Lau E, Halpern M. Projections of Primary and Revision Hip and Knee Arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89-A:780–785. - PubMed
-
- Berry DJ, Harmsen WS, Cabanela ME, Morrey BF. Twenty-five-year survivorship of two thousand consecutive primary Charnley total hip replacements. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002;842:171–177. - PubMed
-
- Willert HG, Semlitsch M. Reactions of the articular capsule to wear products of artificial joint prostheses. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research. 1977;112:157–164. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
