Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2017 Jun;5(3):10.1128/microbiolspec.funk-0044-2017.
doi: 10.1128/microbiolspec.FUNK-0044-2017.

What Defines the "Kingdom" Fungi?

Affiliations
Review

What Defines the "Kingdom" Fungi?

Thomas A Richards et al. Microbiol Spectr. 2017 Jun.

Abstract

The application of environmental DNA techniques and increased genome sequencing of microbial diversity, combined with detailed study of cellular characters, has consistently led to the reexamination of our understanding of the tree of life. This has challenged many of the definitions of taxonomic groups, especially higher taxonomic ranks such as eukaryotic kingdoms. The Fungi is an example of a kingdom which, together with the features that define it and the taxa that are grouped within it, has been in a continual state of flux. In this article we aim to summarize multiple lines of data pertinent to understanding the early evolution and definition of the Fungi. These include ongoing cellular and genomic comparisons that, we will argue, have generally undermined all attempts to identify a synapomorphic trait that defines the Fungi. This article will also summarize ongoing work focusing on taxon discovery, combined with phylogenomic analysis, which has identified novel groups that lie proximate/adjacent to the fungal clade-wherever the boundary that defines the Fungi may be. Our hope is that, by summarizing these data in the form of a discussion, we can illustrate the ongoing efforts to understand what drove the evolutionary diversification of fungi.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Diversity and distribution of gene families known to function in chitin cell wall synthesis or remodeling. (A) The diversity of domain architectures (as identified using PFAM [184]) for chitin cell wall synthesis or remodeling gene families. Note the gene fusion between a myosin head domain motor protein and a chitin synthase which was previously suggested to be fungus-specific (92). (B) The taxonomic distribution of putative homologues across a subset of eukaryotic taxa identified using a custom-built set of domain-specific hidden Markov models kindly provided by Jason Stajich and Divya Sain (185). The fungal component of the phylogenetic tree is based on Spatafora et al. (186).
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Diversity and distribution of gene families known to function in hyphal growth. (A) A cartoon illustrating how proteins interact relating to subprocesses which govern vesicle trafficking associated with hyphal growth. Functions are briefly discussed in the main body of this manuscript and are marked i to viii. (B) The taxonomic distribution of putative orthologues identified using reciprocal BLAST searches and phylogenetic methods across a subset of eukaryotic taxa (data not shown). The fungal component of the phylogenetic tree is based on Spatafora et al. (186).
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Cartoon illustration summarizing how features previously discussed as defining the protist-fungal transition have been shown to have a mosaic distribution within the Fungi and/or outside the Fungi among other eukaryotes. White connecting nodes illustrate linked characters/traits.
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
Schematic phylogenetic tree illustrating additional groups branching proximate to the origin of the fungal clade and the phylogenetic uncertainty among the deep branches of the Fungi and associated groups. Basal clone group 1 is composed of environmental sequences, which in some analyses is placed close to fungi (149).

References

    1. Whittaker RH. 1969. New concepts of kingdoms or organisms: evolutionary relations are better represented by new classifications than by the traditional two kingdoms. Science 163:150–160. 10.1126/science.163.3863.150[PubMed] - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ruggiero MA, Gordon DP, Orrell TM, Bailly N, Bourgoin T, Brusca RC, Cavalier-Smith T, Guiry MD, Kirk PM. 2015. A higher level classification of all living organisms. PLoS One 10:e0119248. (Erratum, 10.1371/journal.pone.0130114.) 10.1371/journal.pone.0119248 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cavalier-Smith T. 2004. Only six kingdoms of life. Proc Biol Sci 271:1251–1262. 10.1098/rspb.2004.2705 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dawson SC, Pace NR. 2002. Novel kingdom-level eukaryotic diversity in anoxic environments. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99:8324–8329. 10.1073/pnas.062169599 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Whittaker RH, Margulis L. 1978. Protist classification and the kingdoms of organisms. Biosystems 10:3–18. 10.1016/0303-2647(78)90023-0 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources