Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Jun 23;12(6):e0179927.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0179927. eCollection 2017.

Estimation of the optimal dosing regimen of escitalopram in dogs: A dose occupancy study with [11C]DASB

Affiliations

Estimation of the optimal dosing regimen of escitalopram in dogs: A dose occupancy study with [11C]DASB

Olivia Taylor et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Although the favourable characteristics of escitalopram as being the most selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor and having an increased therapeutic efficacy via binding on an additional allosteric binding site of the serotonin transporter, its dosing regimen has not yet been optimized for its use in dogs. This study aimed to estimate the optimal dosing frequency and the required dose for achieving 80% occupancy of the serotonin transporters in the basal ganglia. The dosing frequency was investigated by determining the elimination half-life after a four day oral pre-treatment period with 0.83 mg/kg escitalopram (3 administrations/day) and a subsequent i.v. injection 0.83 mg/kg. Blood samples were taken up to 12 hours after i.v. injection and the concentration of escitalopram in plasma was analysed via LC-MSMS. The dose-occupancy relationship was then determined by performing two PET scans in five adult beagles: a baseline PET scan and a second scan after steady state conditions were achieved following oral treatment with a specific dose of escitalopram ranging from 0.5 to 2.5 mg/kg/day. As the elimination half-life was determined to be 6.7 hours a dosing frequency of three administrations a day was proposed for the second part of the study. Further it was opted for a treatment period of four days, which well exceeded the minimum period to achieve steady state conditions. The optimal dosing regimen to achieve 80% occupancy in the basal ganglia and elicit a therapeutic effect, was calculated to be 1.85 mg/kg/day, divided over three administrations. Under several circumstances, such as insufficient response to other SSRIs, concurrent drug intake or in research studies focused on SERT, the use of escitalopram can be preferred over the use of the already for veterinary use registered fluoxetine, however, in case of long-term treatment with escitalopram, regularly cardiac screening is recommended.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Escitalopram plasma concentration over time after IV injection of 0.83 mg/kg escitalopram.
This IV injection was given 6 hours after the last gift of the preliminary oral treatment (0.83 mg/kg, 3 administrations/day, 4 days).
Fig 2
Fig 2. Time-activity curves in basal ganglia and reference region after IV injection of [11C]DASB at baseline levels and after a four day oral treatment period with escitalopram (2 mg/kg/day divided over 3 administrations).
Fig 3
Fig 3. Coregistration of MRI and PET, at baseline levels and after a four day oral treatment period with 2 mg/kg/day escitalopram.
The SUVbw parameter is presented for each voxel on a summed PET-image between 40 and 60 minutes after IV injection of [11C]DASB. Regions of interest delineated on MRI: BG: basal ganglia, Ce: cerebellar cortex (vermis excluded), Co: colliculi, Hi: hippocampus, Th: thalamus, RN: brainstem region containing the raphe nuclei.
Fig 4
Fig 4. Relationship between the dose of escitalopram and the SERT-occupancy measured in the basal ganglia.
R2 represents the nonlinear regression fit of the hyperbola; KDapp represents the required dose to occupy 50% of the SERT sites. * represents the excluded experimental data point for the fitting.

References

    1. Sanchez C, Reines EH, Montgomery SA. A comparative review of escitalopram, paroxetine, and sertraline: Are they all alike? Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 2014;29: 185–96. doi: 10.1097/YIC.0000000000000023 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bræstrup C, Sanchez C. Escitalopram: a unique mechanism of action. Int J Psychiatry Clin Pract. 2004;8 Suppl 1: 11–3. - PubMed
    1. http://www.fda.gov/NewsEvents/Newsroom/PressAnnouncements/ucm296006.htm
    1. Toutain P-L, Ferran A, Bousquet-Mélou A. Species differences in pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. Handb Exp Pharmacol. 2010; 19–48. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-10324-7_2 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Waade RB, Hermann M, Moe HL, Molden E. Impact of age on serum concentrations of venlafaxine and escitalopram in different CYP2D6 and CYP2C19 genotype subgroups. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2014;70: 933–940. - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources