Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Sep 1:178:87-93.
doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2017.04.031. Epub 2017 Jun 13.

Heroin and saccharin demand and preference in rats

Affiliations

Heroin and saccharin demand and preference in rats

Lindsay P Schwartz et al. Drug Alcohol Depend. .

Abstract

Background: Several recent studies have investigated the choice between heroin and a non-drug alternative reinforcer in rats. A common finding in these studies is that there are large individual differences in preference, with some rats preferring heroin and some preferring the non-drug alternative. The primary goal of the present study was to determine whether individual differences in how heroin or saccharin is valued, based on demand analysis, predicts choice.

Methods: Rats lever-pressed for heroin infusions and saccharin reinforcers on fixed-ratio schedules. The essential value of each reinforcer was obtained from resulting demand curves. Rats were then trained on a mutually exclusive choice procedure where pressing one lever resulted in heroin and pressing another resulted in saccharin. After seven sessions of increased access to heroin or saccharin, rats were reexposed to the demand and choice procedures.

Results: Demand for heroin was more elastic than demand for saccharin (i.e., heroin had lower essential value than saccharin). When allowed to choose, most rats preferred saccharin. The essential value of heroin, but not saccharin, predicted preference. The essential value of both heroin and saccharin increased following a week of increased access to heroin, but similar saccharin exposure had no effect on essential value. Preference was unchanged after increased access to either reinforcer.

Conclusion: Heroin-preferring rats differed from saccharin-preferring rats in how they valued heroin, but not saccharin. To the extent that choice models addiction-related behavior, these results suggest that overvaluation of opioids specifically, rather than undervaluation of non-drug alternatives, could identify susceptible individuals.

Keywords: Choice; Demand; Essential value; Heroin self-administration; Rats; Saccharin.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest

All authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Schematic diagram of sequence of phases.
Figure 2
Figure 2
a: Group mean numbers of heroin infusions (filled circles) and saccharin reinforcers (open squares) earned at each FR plus demand curves fit by the exponential model. b: Normalized consumption as a function of normalized price as well as normalized demand curves fit by the model. c: Mean (± SEM) essential value of heroin (black bar) and saccharin (white bar). ** indicates p < 0.01.
Figure 3
Figure 3
a: Percent choice of heroin averaged over criterion sessions for individual subjects. The horizontal line represents group mean preference. b: Mean (± SEM) percent choice of heroin at each saccharin FR. The FR for heroin was always 1. c: Scatter plot and best-fit line showing relationship between heroin’s essential value and percent choice of heroin. d: Scatter plot and best-fit line showing relationship between saccharin’s essential value and percent choice of heroin. * indicates p < 0.05. ** indicates p < 0.01
Figure 4
Figure 4
Mean (± SEM) essential value of heroin and saccharin for heroin preferers (black bars) and saccharin preferers (white bars). * indicates p < 0.05
Figure 5
Figure 5
Mean (± SEM) essential value of heroin (black bars) and saccharin (white bars) before and after the increased-access phase for the Heroin group (left of dashed line) and the Saccharin group (right of dashed line). ** indicates p < 0.01

References

    1. Ahmed SH. Validation crisis in animal models of drug addiction: Beyond non-disordered drug use toward drug addiction. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2010;35:172–84. - PubMed
    1. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J. Royal. Stat. Soc. 1995;57:289–300.
    1. Bentzley BS, Fender KM, Aston-Jones G. The behavioral economics of drug self-administration: A review and new analytical approach for within-session procedures. Psychopharmacol. 2013;226:113–125. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bentzley BS, Jhou TC, Aston-Jones G. Economic demand predicts addiction-like behavior and therapeutic efficacy of oxytocin in the rat. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2014;111:11822–11827. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cantin L, Lenoir M, Augier E, Vanhille N, Dubreucq S, Serre F, Vouillac C, Ahmed SH. Cocaine is low on the value ladder of rats: Possible evidence for resilience to addiction. PLoS One. 2010;5:e11592. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources