Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Jun 23;13(1):192.
doi: 10.1186/s12917-017-1086-4.

Impact of growth matrix on pharmacodynamics of antimicrobial drugs for pig pneumonia pathogens

Affiliations

Impact of growth matrix on pharmacodynamics of antimicrobial drugs for pig pneumonia pathogens

Lucy Dorey et al. BMC Vet Res. .

Abstract

Background: The most widely used measure of potency of antimicrobial drugs is Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC). MIC is usually determined under standardised conditions in broths formulated to optimise bacterial growth on a species-by-species basis. This ensures comparability of data between laboratories. However, differences in values of MIC may arise between broths of differing chemical composition and for some drug classes major differences occur between broths and biological fluids such as serum and inflammatory exudate. Such differences must be taken into account, when breakpoint PK/PD indices are derived and used to predict dosages for clinical use. There is therefore interest in comparing MIC values in several broths and, in particular, in comparing broth values with those generated in serum. For the pig pneumonia pathogens, Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae and Pasteurella multocida, MICs were determined for three drugs, florfenicol, oxytetracycline and marbofloxacin, in five broths [Mueller Hinton Broth (MHB), cation-adjusted Mueller Hinton Broth (CAMHB), Columbia Broth supplemented with NAD (CB), Brain Heart Infusion Broth (BHI) and Tryptic Soy Broth (TSB)] and in pig serum.

Results: For each drug, similar MIC values were obtained in all broths, with one exception, marbofloxacin having similar MICs for three broths and 4-5-fold higher MICs for two broths. In contrast, for both organisms, quantitative differences between broth and pig serum MICs were obtained after correction of MICs for drug binding to serum protein (fu serum MIC). Potency was greater (fu serum MIC lower) in serum than in broths for marbofloxacin and florfenicol for both organisms. For oxytetracycline fu serum:broth MIC ratios were 6.30:1 (P. multocida) and 0.35:1 (A. pleuropneumoniae), so that potency of this drug was reduced for the former species and increased for the latter species. The chemical composition of pig serum and broths was compared; major matrix differences in 14 constituents did not account for MIC differences. Bacterial growth rates were compared in broths and pig serum in the absence of drugs; it was concluded that broth/serum MIC differences might be due to differing growth rates in some but not all instances.

Conclusions: For all organisms and all drugs investigated in this study, it is suggested that broth MICs should be adjusted by an appropriate scaling factor when used to determine pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic breakpoints for dosage prediction.

Keywords: A. Pleuropneumoniae; Florfenicol; Marbofloxacin; Minimum inhibitory concentration; Oxytetracycline; P. Multocida.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Pie chart comparing the concentrations of constituents in eight matrices: Porcine serum, bovine serum, cation-adjusted Mueller Hinton Broth (CAMHB), Mueller Hinton Broth (MHB), Columbia broth supplemented with NAD (CB), Veterinary Fastidious Medium (VFM), Trypic Soy broth (TSB) and Brain Heart Infusion broth (BHI). Highlighted with a star is one of the more notably important components, total protein
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
In vitro growth of P. multocida (n = 20 isolates) at time points 0, 6 and 24 h in CAMHB and pig serum (n = 20). Growth quantified in log10 CFU/mL (ordinate); each bar represents mean of triplicate analyses
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
In vitro growth of A. pleuropneumoniae (n = 20 isolates) at time points 0, 6 and 24 h in VFM and pig serum. Growth quantified in log10 CFU/mL (ordinate); each bar represents mean of triplicate analyses

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Toutain PL, Lees P. Integration and modelling of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data to optimize dosage regimens in veterinary medicine. J Vet Pharmacol Ther. 2004;27(6):467-7. - PubMed
    1. Nielsen EI, Cars O, Friberg LE. Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) indices of antibiotic predicted by a semimechanistic PK/PD model: a step toward model-based dose optimization. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2011;55(10):4619–4630. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00182-11. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nielsen EI, Friberg LE. Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic modeling of antibacterial drugs. Pharmacol Rev. 2013;65(3):1053–1090. doi: 10.1124/pr.111.005769. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lees P, Pelligand L, Illambas J, Potter T, Lacroix M, Rycroft A, et al. Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic integration and modelling of amoxicillin for the calf pathogens Mannheimia haemolytica and Pasteurella multocida. J Vet Pharmacol Ther. 2015;38(5):457–470. doi: 10.1111/jvp.12207. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Martinez MN, Papich MG, Drusano GL. Dosing regimen matters: the importance of early intervention and rapid attainment of the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic target. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2012;56(6):2795–2805. doi: 10.1128/AAC.05360-11. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms