Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Jun 22;7(6):e015478.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015478.

Development of a meta-algorithm for guiding primary care encounters for patients with multimorbidity using evidence-based and case-based guideline development methodology

Affiliations

Development of a meta-algorithm for guiding primary care encounters for patients with multimorbidity using evidence-based and case-based guideline development methodology

Cathleen Muche-Borowski et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Objective: The study aimed to develop a comprehensive algorithm (meta-algorithm) for primary care encounters of patients with multimorbidity. We used a novel, case-based and evidence-based procedure to overcome methodological difficulties in guideline development for patients with complex care needs.

Study design: Systematic guideline development methodology including systematic evidence retrieval (guideline synopses), expert opinions and informal and formal consensus procedures.

Setting: Primary care.

Intervention: The meta-algorithm was developed in six steps:1. Designing 10 case vignettes of patients with multimorbidity (common, epidemiologically confirmed disease patterns and/or particularly challenging health care needs) in a multidisciplinary workshop.2. Based on the main diagnoses, a systematic guideline synopsis of evidence-based and consensus-based clinical practice guidelines was prepared. The recommendations were prioritised according to the clinical and psychosocial characteristics of the case vignettes.3. Case vignettes along with the respective guideline recommendations were validated and specifically commented on by an external panel of practicing general practitioners (GPs).4. Guideline recommendations and experts' opinions were summarised as case specific management recommendations (N-of-one guidelines).5. Healthcare preferences of patients with multimorbidity were elicited from a systematic literature review and supplemented with information from qualitative interviews.6. All N-of-one guidelines were analysed using pattern recognition to identify common decision nodes and care elements. These elements were put together to form a generic meta-algorithm.

Results: The resulting meta-algorithm reflects the logic of a GP's encounter of a patient with multimorbidity regarding decision-making situations, communication needs and priorities. It can be filled with the complex problems of individual patients and hereby offer guidance to the practitioner. Contrary to simple, symptom-oriented algorithms, the meta-algorithm illustrates a superordinate process that permanently keeps the entire patient in view.

Conclusion: The meta-algorithm represents the back bone of the multimorbidity guideline of the German College of General Practitioners and Family Physicians. This article presents solely the development phase; the meta-algorithm needs to be piloted before it can be implemented.

Keywords: clinical practice guidelines; guideline development; multimorbidity; primary care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Methodological steps to develop a ‘Meta-Algorithm’ for the management of patients with multimorbidity.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Case-specific algorithm (N-of-one guideline): The 91-year-old patient with multimorbidity presents to his family physician accompanied by his daughter. The reason for encounter is: the patient does not speak anymore. Against the background of established diagnosis, the GP has to decide whether the new symptom is explained by the known diagnoses. If so, progress will be made towards improved disease management. If not, exclusion of an avoidable dangerous course will be prioritised. GP, general practitioner.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Meta-algorithm to guide the care of patients with multimorbidity in general practice.

References

    1. Marengoni A, Angleman S, Melis R, et al. . Aging with multimorbidity: a systematic review of the literature. Ageing Res Rev 2011;10:430–9. 10.1016/j.arr.2011.03.003 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Schram MT, Frijters D, van de Lisdonk EH, et al. . Setting and registry characteristics affect the prevalence and nature of multimorbidity in the elderly. J Clin Epidemiol 2008;61:1104–12. 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.11.021 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fortin M, Hudon C, Haggerty J, et al. . Prevalence estimates of multimorbidity: a comparative study of two sources. BMC Health Serv Res 2010;10:111 10.1186/1472-6963-10-111 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. van den Bussche H, Schäfer I, Wiese B, et al. . A comparative study demonstrated that prevalence figures on multimorbidity require cautious interpretation when drawn from a single database. J Clin Epidemiol 2013;66:209–17. 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2012.07.019 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Uijen AA, van de Lisdonk EH. Multimorbidity in primary care: prevalence and trend over the last 20 years. Eur J Gen Pract 2008;14(Suppl 1):28–32. 10.1080/13814780802436093 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources