A multicentre, randomised controlled, non-inferiority trial, comparing nasal high flow with nasal continuous positive airway pressure as primary support for newborn infants with early respiratory distress born in Australian non-tertiary special care nurseries (the HUNTER trial): study protocol
- PMID: 28645982
- PMCID: PMC5541635
- DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016746
A multicentre, randomised controlled, non-inferiority trial, comparing nasal high flow with nasal continuous positive airway pressure as primary support for newborn infants with early respiratory distress born in Australian non-tertiary special care nurseries (the HUNTER trial): study protocol
Abstract
Introduction: Nasal high-flow (nHF) therapy is a popular mode of respiratory support for newborn infants. Evidence for nHF use is predominantly from neonatal intensive care units (NICUs). There are no randomised trials of nHF use in non-tertiary special care nurseries (SCNs). We hypothesise that nHF is non-inferior to nasal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) as primary support for newborn infants with respiratory distress, in the population cared for in non-tertiary SCNs.
Methods and analysis: The HUNTER trial is an unblinded Australian multicentre, randomised, non-inferiority trial. Infants are eligible if born at a gestational age ≥31 weeks with birth weight ≥1200 g and admitted to a participating non-tertiary SCN, are <24 hours old at randomisation and require non-invasive respiratory support or supplemental oxygen for >1 hour. Infants are randomised to treatment with either nHF or CPAP. The primary outcome is treatment failure within 72 hours of randomisation, as determined by objective oxygenation, apnoea or blood gas criteria or by a clinical decision that urgent intubation and mechanical ventilation, or transfer to a tertiary NICU, is required. Secondary outcomes include incidence of pneumothorax requiring drainage, duration of respiratory support, supplemental oxygen and hospitalisation, costs associated with hospital care, cost-effectiveness, parental stress and satisfaction and nursing workload.
Ethics and dissemination: Multisite ethical approval for the study has been granted by The Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia (Trial Reference No. 34222), and by each participating site. The trial is currently recruiting in eight centres in Victoria and New South Wales, Australia, with one previous site no longer recruiting. The trial results will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and will be presented at national and international conferences.
Trial registration number: Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR): ACTRN12614001203640; pre-results.
Keywords: neonatology; paediatrics; perinatology.
© Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: None declared.
Figures
Similar articles
-
A multicentre, randomised controlled, non-inferiority trial, comparing high flow therapy with nasal continuous positive airway pressure as primary support for preterm infants with respiratory distress (the HIPSTER trial): study protocol.BMJ Open. 2015 Jun 24;5(6):e008483. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008483. BMJ Open. 2015. PMID: 26109120 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Refining the Use of Nasal High-Flow Therapy as Primary Respiratory Support for Preterm Infants.J Pediatr. 2018 May;196:65-70.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2018.01.031. Epub 2018 Mar 9. J Pediatr. 2018. PMID: 29526471 Clinical Trial.
-
Nasal High-Flow Therapy for Newborn Infants in Special Care Nurseries.N Engl J Med. 2019 May 23;380(21):2031-2040. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1812077. N Engl J Med. 2019. PMID: 31116919 Clinical Trial.
-
Is Nasal High Flow Inferior to Continuous Positive Airway Pressure for Neonates?Clin Perinatol. 2019 Sep;46(3):537-551. doi: 10.1016/j.clp.2019.05.005. Epub 2019 Jun 13. Clin Perinatol. 2019. PMID: 31345545 Review.
-
Heated humidified high-flow nasal cannula therapy in children.Arch Dis Child. 2015 Jun;100(6):571-5. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2014-306590. Epub 2014 Dec 1. Arch Dis Child. 2015. PMID: 25452315 Review.
Cited by
-
Influence of high-flow nasal cannulae on clinical outcomes in elderly patients with acute respiratory failure: a prognostic risk factor analysis.Am J Transl Res. 2024 Aug 15;16(8):3510-3518. doi: 10.62347/URHG8462. eCollection 2024. Am J Transl Res. 2024. PMID: 39262710 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Current insights in non-invasive ventilation for the treatment of neonatal respiratory disease.Ital J Pediatr. 2019 Aug 19;45(1):105. doi: 10.1186/s13052-019-0707-x. Ital J Pediatr. 2019. PMID: 31426828 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Best practices, challenges and innovations in pediatrics in 2019.Ital J Pediatr. 2020 Nov 30;46(1):176. doi: 10.1186/s13052-020-00941-1. Ital J Pediatr. 2020. PMID: 33256810 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Non-invasive respiratory support in preterm infants as primary mode: a network meta-analysis.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jul 1;7(7):CD014895. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014895.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025. PMID: 40590276 Review.
-
High flow nasal cannula for respiratory support in term infants.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Aug 4;8(8):CD011010. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011010.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023. PMID: 37542728 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Australian Institute of Health and Welfare 2016. Australia’s mothers and babies 2014—in brief. Perinatal statistics series no. 32. Cat no. PER 87. Canberra: AIHW, 2016.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Molecular Biology Databases