Long-term and short-term outcomes of using bilateral internal mammary artery grafting versus left internal mammary artery grafting: a meta-analysis
- PMID: 28646103
- DOI: 10.1136/heartjnl-2016-310864
Long-term and short-term outcomes of using bilateral internal mammary artery grafting versus left internal mammary artery grafting: a meta-analysis
Abstract
Background: A substantial body of evidence demonstrates that myocardial revascularisation using bilateral internal mammary arteries (BIMA) improves long-term survival compared with single/left internal mammary artery (LIMA) grafting. To date, limited analyses have been made regarding other short-term and long-term outcomes in BIMA strategy.
Objectives: The primary aim of the present review is to update the difference in long-term survival between BIMA and LIMA grafting and to thoroughly investigate other secondary short-term and long-term clinical outcomes between these two grafting procedures.
Methods: Electronic searches were performed using three databases from their inception to November 2015. Relevant studies comparing long-term survival between BIMA and LIMA grafting were identified. Data were extracted by two independent reviewers and analysed according to predefined clinical outcomes.
Results: Twenty-nine observational studies were identified, with a total of 89 399 patients. Overall, BIMA cohort had significantly improved long-term survival compared with LIMA cohort (HR 0.78; p<0.00001). BIMA cohort also had significantly reduced hospital mortality rates (1.2% vs 2.1%, p=0.04), cerebrovascular accidents (1.3% vs 2.9%, p=0.0003) and need for revascularisation (4.8% vs 10%, p=0.005), although the incidence of deep sternal wound infection (DSWI) was increased (1.8% vs 1.4%, p=0.0008) in this grafting strategy. Long-term cardiac-free, myocardial infarction-free and angina-free survivals were also superior for the BIMA cohort.
Conclusions: BIMA grafting is associated with enhanced overall long-term outcomes compared with LIMA grafting. While the BIMA cohort demonstrates an increased incidence of DSWI, the survival benefits and other morbidity advantages outweigh this short-term risk.
Keywords: Internal mammary artery (IMA); bilateral; coronary artery bypass graft (CABG); meta-analysis.; survival.
© Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: None declared.
Comment in
-
Arterial grafting for coronary revascularisation and the illusive search for truth.Heart. 2017 Sep;103(18):1394-1395. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2017-311289. Epub 2017 Jul 12. Heart. 2017. PMID: 28701472 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Hybrid coronary revascularization versus coronary artery bypass surgery with bilateral or single internal mammary artery grafts.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016 Apr;151(4):1081-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2015.10.061. Epub 2015 Oct 26. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016. PMID: 26687889
-
Thirty-year follow-up defines survival benefit for second internal mammary artery in propensity-matched groups.Ann Thorac Surg. 2010 Jul;90(1):101-8. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2010.04.006. Ann Thorac Surg. 2010. PMID: 20609757
-
Impact of the Radial Artery as an Additional Arterial Conduit During In-Situ Bilateral Internal Mammary Artery Grafting: A Propensity Score-Matched Study.Ann Thorac Surg. 2016 Mar;101(3):913-8. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.08.054. Epub 2015 Nov 11. Ann Thorac Surg. 2016. PMID: 26576749
-
Current Readings: Single vs Bilateral Internal Mammary Artery in Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018 Winter;30(4):398-405. doi: 10.1053/j.semtcvs.2018.05.004. Epub 2018 Jun 24. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018. PMID: 29949738 Review.
-
Surgical strategies for bilateral internal mammary artery grafting.Int J Surg. 2015 Apr;16(Pt B):140-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.11.006. Epub 2014 Nov 8. Int J Surg. 2015. PMID: 25463040 Review.
Cited by
-
Differential myocardial strain in the early postoperative period in patients receiving arterial vs venous bypass grafts: A hypothesis-generating study.J Card Surg. 2020 Aug;35(8):1824-1831. doi: 10.1111/jocs.14695. Epub 2020 Jun 24. J Card Surg. 2020. PMID: 32579770 Free PMC article.
-
Association of HbA1c and utilization of internal mammary arteries with wound infections in CABG.Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Mar 18;11:1345726. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1345726. eCollection 2024. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024. PMID: 38562186 Free PMC article.
-
Survival and Independent Predictors of Mortality Following Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery in a Single-Unit Practice in the United Kingdom Over 20 Years.Cureus. 2023 May 1;15(5):e38413. doi: 10.7759/cureus.38413. eCollection 2023 May. Cureus. 2023. PMID: 37273356 Free PMC article.
-
Randomized Comparison of the Outcome of Single Versus Multiple Arterial Grafts trial (ROMA):Women-a trial dedicated to women to improve coronary bypass outcomes.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2024 Apr;167(4):1316-1321. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2023.06.006. Epub 2023 Jun 15. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2024. PMID: 37330205 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Differences in long-term survival outcomes after coronary artery bypass grafting using single vs multiple arterial grafts: a meta-analysis with reconstructed time-to-event data and subgroup analyses.Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2023 Feb;71(2):77-89. doi: 10.1007/s11748-022-01891-7. Epub 2022 Nov 17. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2023. PMID: 36394709 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical