Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Jun 24;17(1):227.
doi: 10.1186/s12888-017-1386-z.

Overview of post-discharge predictors for psychiatric re-hospitalisations: a systematic review of the literature

Affiliations

Overview of post-discharge predictors for psychiatric re-hospitalisations: a systematic review of the literature

R Sfetcu et al. BMC Psychiatry. .

Abstract

Background: High levels of hospital readmission (rehospitalisation rates) is widely used as indicator of a poor quality of care. This is sometimes also referred to as recidivism or heavy utilization. Previous studies have examined a number of factors likely to influence readmission, although a systematic review of research on post-discharge factors and readmissions has not been conducted so far. The main objective of this review was to identify frequently reported post-discharge factors and their effects on readmission rates.

Methods: Studies on the association between post-discharge variables and readmission after an index discharge with a main psychiatric diagnosis were searched in the bibliographic databases Ovid Medline, PsycINFO, ProQuest Health Management, OpenGrey and Google Scholar. Relevant articles published between January 1990 and June 2014 were included. A systematic approach was used to extract and organize in categories the information about post-discharge factors associated with readmission rates.

Results: Of the 760 articles identified by the initial search, 80 were selected for this review which included a total number of 59 different predictors of psychiatric readmission. Subsequently these were grouped into four categories: 1) individual vulnerability factors, 2) aftercare related factors, 3) community care and service responsiveness, and 4) contextual factors and social support. Individual factors were addressed in 58 papers and were found to be significant in 37 of these, aftercare factors were significant in 30 out of the 45 papers, community care and social support factors were significant in 21 out of 31 papers addressing these while contextual factors and social support were significant in all seven papers which studied them.

Conclusions: This review represents a first attempt at providing an overview of post-discharge factors previously studied in association with readmission. Hence, by mapping out the current research in the area, it highlights the gaps in research and it provides guidance future studies in the area.

Keywords: Aftercare; Community care; Contextual factors; Post-discharge factors; Readmission; Social support; System responsiveness; Systematic review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Studies selection flowchart

References

    1. Lien L. Are readmission rates influenced by how psychiatric services are organized? Nord J Psychiatry. 2002;56(1):23–28. doi: 10.1080/08039480252803873. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fischer C, Anema HA, Klazinga NS. The validity of indicators for assessing quality of care: a review of the European literature on hospital readmission rate. Eur J Pub Health. 2012;22(4):484–491. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckr165. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Vigod SN, et al. Transitional interventions to reduce early psychiatric readmissions in adults: systematic review. Br J Psychiatry J Ment Sci. 2013;202(3):187–194. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.112.115030. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dausey DJ, Rosenheck RA, Lehman AF. Preadmission care as a new mental health performance indicator. Psychiatr Serv Wash DC. 2002;53(11):1451–1455. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.53.11.1451. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Krumholz HM. Post-hospital syndrome — an acquired, transient condition of generalized risk. N Engl J Med. 2013;368(2):100–102. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1212324. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms