Quantitative imaging outperforms molecular markers when predicting response to chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer
- PMID: 28647399
- PMCID: PMC5641595
- DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2017.06.013
Quantitative imaging outperforms molecular markers when predicting response to chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer
Abstract
Background and purpose: To explore the integration of imaging and molecular data for response prediction to chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for rectal cancer.
Material and methods: Eighty-five rectal cancer patients underwent preoperative CRT. 18F-FDG PET/CT and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) were acquired before (TP1) and during CRT (TP2) and prior to surgery (TP3). Inflammatory cytokines and gene expression were analysed. Tumour response was defined as ypT0-1N0. Multivariate models were built combining the obtained parameters. Final models were calculated on the data combination with the highest AUC.
Results: Twenty-two patients (26%) achieved ypT0-1N0 response. 18F-FDG PET/CT had worse predictive performance than DWI and T2-volumetry (AUC 0.61±0.04, 0.72±0.03, and 0.72±0.02, respectively). Combining all imaging parameters increased the AUC to 0.81±0.03. Adding cytokines or gene expression did not improve the AUC (AUC of 0.72±0.06 and 0.79±0.04 respectively). Final models combining 18F-FDG PET/CT, DWI, and T2-weighted volumetry at all TPs and using only TP1 and TP3, allowed ypT0-1N0 prediction with a 75% sensitivity, 94% specificity and PPV of 80%.
Conclusions: Combining 18F-FDG PET/CT, DWI, and T2-weighted MRI volumetry obtained before CRT and prior to surgery may help physicians in selecting rectal cancer patients for organ-preservation.
Keywords: Chemoradiotherapy; Imaging; Molecular markers; Rectal cancer; Response prediction.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
There are no conflicts of interest to declare.
Figures


References
-
- Heald RJ, Ryall RD. Recurrence and survival after total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Lancet. 1986;1(8496):1479–82. - PubMed
-
- Sauer R, Liersch T, Merkel S, et al. Preoperative versus postoperative chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer: results of the German CAO/ARO/AIO-94 randomized phase III trial after a median follow-up of 11 years. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30(16):1926–33. - PubMed
-
- Maas M, Nelemans PJ, Valentini V, et al. Long-term outcome in patients with a pathological complete response after chemoradiation for rectal cancer: a pooled analysis of individual patient data. Lancet Oncol. 2010;11(9):835–44. - PubMed
-
- Rödel C, Martus P, Papadoupolos T, et al. Prognostic significance of tumor regression after preoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23(34):8688–96. - PubMed
-
- Lezoche G, Baldarelli M, Guerrieri M, et al. A prospective randomized study with a 5-year minimum follow-up evaluation of transanal endoscopic microsurgery versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision after neoadjuvant therapy. Surg Endosc. 2008;22(2):352–58. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Research Materials