Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2017 Aug;18(8):58.
doi: 10.1007/s11934-017-0710-y.

Training in Robotic Surgery-an Overview

Affiliations
Review

Training in Robotic Surgery-an Overview

Ashwin N Sridhar et al. Curr Urol Rep. 2017 Aug.

Abstract

Purpose of review: There has been a rapid and widespread adoption of the robotic surgical system with a lag in the development of a comprehensive training and credentialing framework. A literature search on robotic surgical training techniques and benchmarks was conducted to provide an evidence-based road map for the development of a robotic surgical skills for the novice robotic surgeon.

Recent findings: A structured training curriculum is suggested incorporating evidence-based training techniques and benchmarks for progress. This usually involves sequential progression from observation, case assisting, acquisition of basic robotic skills in the dry and wet lab setting along with achievement of individual and team-based non-technical skills, modular console training under supervision, and finally independent practice. Robotic surgical training must be based on demonstration of proficiency and safety in executing basic robotic skills and procedural tasks prior to independent practice.

Keywords: Robotic surgery; Robotic surgical training; Urosurgery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest

Ashwin N. Sridhar, Tim P. Briggs, John D. Kelly, and Senthil Nathan each declare no potential conflicts of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Pathway for training in robotic surgery

References

    1. Annual report 2015.
    1. Weinstein GS, OʼMalley BW, Desai SC, Quon H. Transoral robotic surgery: does the ends justify the means? Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2009;17(2):126–131. doi: 10.1097/MOO.0b013e32832924f5. - DOI - PubMed
    1. A. Toker, Robotic thoracic surgery: from the perspectives of European chest surgeons. J. Thorac. Dis., vol. 6 Suppl 2, no. Suppl 2, pp. S211-6, May 2014. - PMC - PubMed
    1. van der Poel H, Brinkman W, van Cleynenbreugel B, Kallidonis P, Stolzenburg J-U, Liatsikos E, Ahmed K, Brunckhorst O, Khan MS, Do M, Ganzer R, Murphy DG, Van Rij S, Dundee PE, Dasgupta P. Training in minimally invasive surgery in urology: European Association of Urology/International Consultation of Urological Diseases consultation. BJU Int. 2016;117(3):515–530. doi: 10.1111/bju.13320. - DOI - PubMed
    1. •• K. Ahmed, R. Khan, A. Mottrie, C. Lovegrove, R. Abaza, R. Ahlawat, T. Ahlering, G. Ahlgren, W. Artibani, E. Barret, X. Cathelineau, B. Challacombe, P. Coloby, M. S. Khan, J. Hubert, M. S. Michel, F. Montorsi, D. Murphy, J. Palou, V. Patel, P.-T. Piechaud, H. Van Poppel, P. Rischmann, R. Sanchez-Salas, S. Siemer, M. Stoeckle, J.-U. Stolzenburg, J.-E. Terrier, J. W. Thüroff, C. Vaessen, H. G. Van Der Poel, B. Van Cleynenbreugel, A. Volpe, C. Wagner, P. Wiklund, T. Wilson, M. Wirth, J. Witt, and P. Dasgupta, Development of a standardised training curriculum for robotic surgery: a consensus statement from an international multidisciplinary group of experts, BJU Int., vol. 116, no. 1, pp. 93–101, Jul. 2015. This study provides a structured pathway for training with validated development protocol. However, it fails to provide benchmarks for progression. - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources