Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 May-Jun;69(3):316-318.
doi: 10.1016/j.ihj.2016.12.008. Epub 2016 Dec 21.

Prevalence and predictors of ventriculo-atrial conduction in structurally normal hearts

Affiliations

Prevalence and predictors of ventriculo-atrial conduction in structurally normal hearts

Ganesh Patil et al. Indian Heart J. 2017 May-Jun.

Abstract

Background: The prevalence of ventriculo-atrial (VA) conduction varies from 20% to 90%, depending on the population studied (Militianu et al., 1997; Inoue et al., 1985; Kazmierczak et al., 1993; Ciemniewski et al., 1990; Hayes and Furman, 1983; Westveer et al., 1984). This wide range is mostly based on studies done in patients with implanted devices or impaired atrioventricular conduction. However, the prevalence of VA conduction in structurally normal heart has not been well documented till date.

Objective: To study the prevalence and identify predictors of retrograde conduction via the His-Purkinje system and AV node in structurally normal hearts.

Methods: We included 54 consecutive adults without structural heart disease who underwent electrophysiological (EP) study for various tachycardias. The basic parameters including PR, AH and HV intervals, atrioventricular Wenckebach point (AVWP) and anterograde effective refractory period (ERP) of atrioventricular node (AVNERP), were measured after ablation. The VA conduction was assessed basally and if absent, after isoprenaline. The VA Wenckebach point (VAWP) and retrograde ERP(VAERP) were recorded in patients showing VA conduction.

Results: The mean age was 37.1±12.6years. Twenty five (46%) of the patients were men. VA conduction was present in 30 (55%) patients at baseline. Of the remaining 24 patients, 18 (34%) showed VA conduction after isoprenaline. Only 6 (11%) patients failed to reveal VA conduction even after adequate response to isoprenaline. Amongst all clinical and EP variables analysed, only the HV interval was shorter (p<0.01) in patients with VA conduction.

Conclusion: In structurally normal hearts, VA conduction was present at baseline in 55% of patients. Isoprenaline unmasked VA conduction in an additional 34% of the subjects. The HV interval was longer in patients without VA conduction.

Keywords: AV node; Electrophysiology; Retrograde conduction.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Militianu A., Salacata A., Meissner M.D. Ventriculoatrial conduction capability and prevalence of 1:1 retrograde conduction during inducible sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia in 305 implantable cardioverter defibrillator recipients. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1997;20:2378–2384. - PubMed
    1. Inoue T., Kobayashi K., Fukuzaki H. Ventriculo-atrial conduction in patients with normal and impaired atrio-ventricular conduction. Jpn Heart J. 1985;26:707–714. - PubMed
    1. Kazmierczak J., Kornacewicz-Jach Z., Gill R., Puchata M. Retrograde conduction (ventriculo-atrial) in patients with AV or intraventricular block: electrophysiologic evaluation. Kardiol Pol. 1993;38:244–248. - PubMed
    1. Ciemniewski Z., Zajac T., Kargul W., Giec L. Atrio-ventricular conduction in patients with permanent right-ventricular stimulation. II. Atrio-ventricular conduction time in patients with normal and impaired atrio-ventricular conduction. Kardiol Pol. 1990;33:79–83S. - PubMed
    1. Hayes D.L., Furman S. Atrio-ventricular and ventriculo-atrial conduction times in patients undergoing pacemaker implant. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1983;6:38–46. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources