Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Jun 21:4:6.
doi: 10.1186/s40814-017-0148-5. eCollection 2018.

Facilitating access to health research through a participatory research register: a feasibility study in outpatient clinics

Verity A Leach  1   2   3 , John D McGeagh  1 , Ruta Margelyte  1 , Niamh M Redmond  1   2 , Axel Walther  4 , Sabi Redwood  1   2 , Richard M Martin #  5   2 , Jenny L Donovan #  1   2
Affiliations

Facilitating access to health research through a participatory research register: a feasibility study in outpatient clinics

Verity A Leach et al. Pilot Feasibility Stud. .

Erratum in

  • Erratum to: Pilot and Feasibility Studies, Vol. 4.
    Pilot and Feasibility Studies. Pilot and Feasibility Studies. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2017 Oct 24;3:48. doi: 10.1186/s40814-017-0183-2. eCollection 2017. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2017. PMID: 29123916 Free PMC article.

Abstract

Background: A research register (Reach West) has been established to facilitate recruitment of people and patients to health-related research. We conducted a prospective feasibility study to investigate the practicality of recruiting through outpatient clinics.

Methods: Patients over 18 years of age attending dental, eye or oncology outpatient clinics in an acute hospital in the West of England were provided with the opportunity to participate in Reach West. In Phase I, recruitment packs were handed to clinic attendees who could place completed consent forms in secure drop-box or return them later on-line or by post. In Phase II, recruitment packs were posted directly to patients with consent forms to be returned by post or on-line. Response rates by age, sex, postcode (for level of deprivation), and clinic type were recorded for those agreeing to participate on paper or on-line.

Results: In Phase I, 2,314 of 4,500 (51.4%) of recruitment packs were handed out to clinic attendees, and 114 (5%) consented to join Reach West. In Phase II, 7,173 of 9000 packs were posted (79.7%), and 387 (5.4%) consented to participate. The overall consent rate was 6% (580), with the majority doing so on paper (87%) rather than on-line. The sample was balanced by sex, but mostly comprised people over 50 years located in less deprived postcodes. Non-staff costs for postal recruitment were lower than hand-outs in clinic (£6.84 compared with £8.05 per participant).

Conclusions: Recruiting participants to the Reach West register was feasible among those with oncology, dental or eye outpatient appointments by post or with packs given out in the clinic. Response rates were similar to those achieved for other registers. Recruitment of participants can be achieved through outpatient clinics but other strategies will also be required to attract large numbers of participants and more diverse populations.

Keywords: Data linkage; Prospective consent; Research database; Research governance; Research participation; Research registers.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Participant invitation and flow chart
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Richesson RL, Sutphen R, Shereff D, Krischer JP. The rare diseases clinical research network contact registry update: Features and functionality. Contemp Clin Trials. 2012;33:647–656. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2012.02.012. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Beale R, Reinhart K, Brunkhorst FM, Dobb G, Levy M, Martin G, Martin C, Ramsey G, Silva E, Valley TB, Vincent JL, Janes JM, Sarwat S, Williams MD. Promoting global research excellence in severe sepsis (PROGRESS): Lessons from an international sepsis registry. Infection. 2009;37:222–232. doi: 10.1007/s15010-008-8203-z. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bentley SM, Melville JL, Berry BD, Katon WJ. Implementing a clinical and research registry in obstetrics: overcoming the barriers. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2007;29:192–198. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2007.01.011. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Tan MH, Thomas M, MacEachern MP. Using registries to recruit subjects for clinical trials. Contemp Clin Trials. 2015;41:31–38. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2014.12.012. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Grant A, Ure J, Nicolson DJ, Hanley J, Sheikh A, McKinstry B, Sullivan F. Acceptibility and perceived barriers and facilitators to creating a national research register to enable ‘direct to patient’ enrolment into research: the Scottish Health Research Register (SHARE) BMC Health Serv Res. 2013;13:422. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-422. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources