Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Jun 26;10(1):228.
doi: 10.1186/s13104-017-2559-z.

Examining the psychometric properties of a sport-related concussion survey: a Rasch measurement approach

Affiliations

Examining the psychometric properties of a sport-related concussion survey: a Rasch measurement approach

Mark Hecimovich et al. BMC Res Notes. .

Abstract

Background: Awareness of sport-related concussion (SRC) is an essential step in increasing the number of athletes or parents who report on SRC. This awareness is important, as there is no established data on medical care at youth-level sports and may be limited to individuals with only first aid training. In this circumstance, aside from the coach, it is the players and their parents who need to be aware of possible signs and symptoms. The aim of this study was to examine the psychometric properties of a parent and player concussion survey intended for use before and after an education campaign regarding SRC.

Methods: 1441 questionnaires were received from parents and 284 questionnaires from players. The responses to the sixteen-item section of the questionnaire's 'recognition of signs and symptoms' were submitted to psychometric analysis using the dichotomous and polytomous Rasch model via the Rasch Unidimensional Measurement Model software RUMM2030. The Rasch model of Modern Test Theory can be considered a refinement of, or advance on, traditional analyses of an instrument's psychometric properties.

Results: The main finding is that these sixteen items measure two factors: items that are symptoms of concussion and items that are not symptoms of concussion. Parents and athletes were able to identify most or all of the symptoms, but were not as good at distinguishing symptoms that are not symptoms of concussion. Analyzing these responses revealed differential item functioning for parents and athletes on non-symptom items. When the DIF was resolved a significant difference was found between parents and athletes.

Conclusions: The main finding is that the items measure two 'dimensions' in concussion symptom recognition. The first dimension consists of those items that are symptoms of concussion and the second dimension of those items that are not symptoms of concussion. Parents and players were able to identify most or all of the symptoms of concussion, so one would not expect to pick up any positive change on these items after an education campaign. Parents and players were not as good at distinguishing symptoms that are not symptoms of concussion. It is on these items that one may possibly expect improvement to manifest, so to evaluate the effectiveness of an education campaign it would pay to look for improvement in distinguishing symptoms that are not symptoms of concussion.

Keywords: Concussion awareness; Education; Measurement; Rasch model.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Histogram of person locations (left) and labeled items (right) on the same measurement continuum. Item labels in blue are the items that are not symptoms of concussion, and labels in red are of items that are symptoms of concussion
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
DIF for item 11 Sharp neck pain: For the same overall level of awareness of concussion symptoms, athletes identified this item correctly as not a symptom of concussion more than parents did
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Person distribution from the analysis of items that are symptoms of concussion (top) and person distribution from the analysis of items that are not symptoms of concussion (bottom)

Similar articles

References

    1. Centers for disease control and prevention (CDC): heads up: concussion in youth sports. http://www.cdc.gov/concussion/HeadsUp/youth.html. Accessed Oct 22 2014.
    1. Dompier T, Kerr Z, Marshall SW, Hainline B, Snook EM, Hayden R, Simon J. Incidence of concussion during practice and games in youth, high school, and collegiate american football players. JAMA Pediatr. 2015;169:659–665. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2015.0210. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Savage J, Hooke C, Orchard J, Parkinson The incidence of concussion in a professional australian rugby league team 1998–2012. J Sports Med. 2013;2013:304576. doi: 10.1155/2013/304576. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fortington LV, Twomey DM, Finch CF. Concussion in community Australian football—epidemiological monitoring of the causes and immediate impact on play. Injury Epidemiol. 2015;2:20. doi: 10.1186/s40621-015-0052-5. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hecimovich M, King D. Prevalence of head injury and medically diagnosed concussion in junior-level community-based Australian Rules Football. J Paediatr Child Health. 2017;53(3):246–251. doi: 10.1111/jpc.13405. - DOI - PubMed