Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Jun 27;12(6):e0179865.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0179865. eCollection 2017.

The role of Patient Health Engagement Model (PHE-model) in affecting patient activation and medication adherence: A structural equation model

Affiliations

The role of Patient Health Engagement Model (PHE-model) in affecting patient activation and medication adherence: A structural equation model

Guendalina Graffigna et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Background: Increasing bodies of scientific research today examines the factors and interventions affecting patients' ability to self-manage and adhere to treatment. Patient activation is considered the most reliable indicator of patients' ability to manage health autonomously. Only a few studies have tried to assess the role of psychosocial factors in promoting patient activation. A more systematic modeling of the psychosocial factors explaining the variance of patient activation is needed.

Objective: To test the hypothesized effect of patient activation on medication adherence; to test the the hypothesized effects of positive emotions and of the quality of the patient/doctor relationship on patient activation; and to test the hypothesized mediating effect of Patient Health Engagement (PHE-model) in this pathway.

Material and methods: This cross-sectional study involved 352 Italian-speaking adult chronic patients. The survey included measures of i) patient activation (Patient Activation Measure 13 -short form); ii) Patient Health Engagement model (Patient Health Engagement Scale); iii) patient adherence (4 item-Morinsky Medication Adherence Scale); iv) the quality of the patients' emotional feelings (Manikin Self Assessment Scale); v) the quality of the patient/doctor relationship (Health Care Climate Questionnaire). Structural equation modeling was used to test the hypotheses proposed.

Results: According to the theoretical model we hypothesized, research results confirmed that patients' activation significantly affects their reported medication adherence. Moreover, psychosocial factors, such as the patients' quality of the emotional feelings and the quality of the patient/doctor relationship were demonstrated to be factors affecting the level of patient activation. Finally, the mediation effect of the Patient Health Engagement model was confirmed by the analysis.

Conclusions: Consistently with the results of previous studies, these findings demonstrate that the Patient Health Engagement Model is a critical factor in enhancing the quality of care. The Patient Health Engagement Model might acts as a mechanism to increase patient activation and adherence.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. The a priori model tested in the current study.
This is a path diagram describing the hypothesized effects of positive emotions and of the ability of the healthcare professionals to support patients’ autonomy on patient activation and medication adherence; it also describes the hypothesized mediating effect of patient engagement in this pathway. Unidirectional straight arrows indicate the predicted direction of the hypothesized effect. Note: HCCQ: Health Care Climate Questionnaire, PHE-s: Patient Health Engagement Scale, SAM: Self-Assessment Manikin Scale, PAM-13: Patient Activation Measure-short form, MMAS-4: 4 item-Morinsky Medication Adherence Scale.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Significant pathways of the final model.
Circles indicate unobserved latent variables, while rectangles represent observed variables. Significant paths with their estimated parameter are shown by solid lines. Standardized path coefficients are presented at the midpoint of the unidirectional arrow paths. Not significant paths are shown by dashed lines.

References

    1. Mosen DM, Schmittdiel J, Hibbard J, Sobel D, Remmers C, Bellows J. Is patient activation associated with outcomes of care for adults with chronic conditions? J Ambul Care Manage [Internet]. 2007;30(1):21–9. Available from: http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-33845773384&partnerID... - PubMed
    1. Hibbard JH, Mahoney E. Toward a theory of patient and consumer activation. Patient Educ Couns [Internet]. 2010. March [cited 2016 Jan 5];78(3):377–81. Available from: http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-77950350077&partnerID... 10.1016/j.pec.2009.12.015 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hibbard JH. Engaging health care consumers to improve the quality of care. Med Care. 2003;41:I61–70. - PubMed
    1. Greene J, Hibbard JH, Sacks R, Overton V, Parrotta CD. When patient activation levels change, health outcomes and costs change, too. Health Aff (Millwood) [Internet]. 2015. March 1 [cited 2015 Nov 16];34(3):431–7. Available from: http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-84924629092&partnerID... - PubMed
    1. Graffigna G, Barello S, Bonanomi A, Lozza E, Hibbard J. Measuring patient activation in Italy: Translation, adaptation and validation of the Italian version of the patient activation measure 13 (PAM13-I). BMC Med Inf Decis Mak [Internet]. 2015;15:109 Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4690217/pdf/12911_2015_Artic... - PMC - PubMed