Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Nov;198(5):1033-1038.
doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.06.083. Epub 2017 Jun 24.

Variation in the Diagnostic Evaluation among Persons with Hematuria: Influence of Gender, Race and Risk Factors for Bladder Cancer

Affiliations

Variation in the Diagnostic Evaluation among Persons with Hematuria: Influence of Gender, Race and Risk Factors for Bladder Cancer

Jacob T Ark et al. J Urol. 2017 Nov.

Abstract

Purpose: We sought to determine whether race, gender and number of bladder cancer risk factors are significant predictors of hematuria evaluation.

Materials and methods: We used self-reported data from SCCS (Southern Community Cohort Study) linked to Medicare claims data. Evaluation of subjects diagnosed with incident hematuria was considered complete if imaging and cystoscopy were performed within 180 days of diagnosis. Exposures of interest were race, gender and risk factors for bladder cancer.

Results: Of the 1,412 patients evaluation was complete in 261 (18%). On our adjusted analyses African American patients were less likely than Caucasian patients to undergo any aspect of evaluation, including urology referral (OR 0.72, 95% CI 0.56-0.93), cystoscopy (OR 0.67, 95% CI 0.50-0.89) and imaging (OR 0.75, 95% CI 0.59-0.95). Women were less likely than men to be referred to a urologist (OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.46-0.76). Also, although all patients with 2 or 3 risk factors had 31% higher odds of urology referral (OR 1.31, 95% CI 1.02-1.69), adjusted analyses indicated that this effect was only apparent among men.

Conclusions: Only 18% of patients with an incident hematuria diagnosis underwent complete hematuria evaluation. Gender had a substantial effect on referral to urology when controlling for socioeconomic factors but otherwise it had an unclear role on the quality of evaluation. African American patients had markedly lower rates of thorough evaluation than Caucasian patients. Number of risk factors predicted referral to urology among men but it was otherwise a poor predictor of evaluation. There is opportunity for improvement by increasing the completion of hematuria evaluations, particularly in patients at high risk and those who are vulnerable.

Keywords: African Americans; hematuria; outcome and process assessment (health care); urinary bladder neoplasm; women.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Estimated expected probability of evaluation outcomes by race-gender strata. Expected probabilities of referral to a urologist, receiving a component of hematuria evaluation (i.e., procedure or imaging), and both components (i.e., complete evaluation). Expected probabilities computed from multivariable models with baseline demographic, clinical, socioeconomic, and environmental characteristics set to medians/modes.

Comment in

  • Editorial Comment.
    Kaffenberger SD, Weizer AZ. Kaffenberger SD, et al. J Urol. 2017 Nov;198(5):1038. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.06.102. Epub 2017 Aug 8. J Urol. 2017. PMID: 28801259 No abstract available.

References

    1. Howlander N, Noone AM, Krapcho M, et al. SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975 – 2010. 2013:1–109. seer.cancer.gov.
    1. DeGraff DJ, Matusik RJ. Gender specific differences in bladder cancer. JURO. 2012;188:10–11. - PubMed
    1. Barocas DA, Alvarez J, Koyama T, et al. Racial variation in the quality of surgical care for bladder cancer. Cancer. 2014;120:1018–1025. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Buteau A, Seideman CA, Svatek RS, et al. What is evaluation of hematuria by primary care physicians? Use of electronic medical records to assess practice patterns with intermediate follow-up. Urol. Oncol. 2014;32:128–134. - PubMed
    1. Friedlander DF, Resnick MJ, You C, et al. Variation in the Intensity of Hematuria Evaluation: A Target for Primary Care Quality Improvement. Am. J. Med. 2014 - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms