Effectiveness and Safety of Apixaban, Dabigatran, and Rivaroxaban Versus Warfarin in Patients With Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation and Previous Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack
- PMID: 28655814
- DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.017474
Effectiveness and Safety of Apixaban, Dabigatran, and Rivaroxaban Versus Warfarin in Patients With Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation and Previous Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack
Abstract
Background and purpose: Limited real-world data exist comparing each non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant (NOAC) to warfarin in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation who have had a previous ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack.
Methods: Using MarketScan claims from January 2012 to June 2015, we identified adults newly initiated on oral anticoagulation, with ≥2 diagnosis codes for nonvalvular atrial fibrillation, a history of previous ischemic stroke/transient ischemic attack, and ≥180 days of continuous medical and prescription benefits before anticoagulation initiation. Three analyses were performed comparing 1:1 propensity score-matched cohorts of apixaban versus warfarin (n=2514), dabigatran versus warfarin (n=1962), and rivaroxaban versus warfarin (n=5208). Patients were followed until occurrence of a combined end point of ischemic stroke and intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) or major bleed, switch/discontinuation of index oral anticoagulation, insurance disenrollment, or end of follow-up. Mean follow-up was 0.5 to 0.6 years for all matched cohorts.
Results: Using Cox regression, neither apixaban nor dabigatran reduced the combined primary end point of ischemic stroke or ICH (hazard ratio [HR], 0.70; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.33-1.48 and HR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.26-1.07) and had nonsignificant effect on hazards of major bleeding (HR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.38-1.64 and HR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.26-1.27) versus warfarin. Rivaroxaban reduced the combined end point of ischemic stroke or ICH (HR, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.29-0.72) without an effect on major bleeding (HR, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.71-1.61). ICH occurred at rates of 0.16 to 0.61 events per 100 person-years in the 3 NOAC analyses, with no significant difference for any NOAC versus warfarin.
Conclusions: Results from our study of the 3 NOACs versus warfarin in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation patients with a previous history of stroke/transient ischemic attack are relatively consistent with their respective phase III trials and previous stroke/transient ischemic attack subgroup analyses. All NOACs seemed no worse than warfarin in respect to ischemic stroke, ICH, or major bleeding risk.
Keywords: anticoagulants; atrial fibrillation; dabigatran; rivaroxaban; stroke.
© 2017 American Heart Association, Inc.
Similar articles
-
Effectiveness and Safety of Dabigatran, Rivaroxaban, and Apixaban Versus Warfarin in Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation.J Am Heart Assoc. 2016 Jun 13;5(6):e003725. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.116.003725. J Am Heart Assoc. 2016. PMID: 27412905 Free PMC article.
-
Effectiveness and Safety of Apixaban, Dabigatran, and Rivaroxaban Versus Warfarin in Frail Patients With Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation.J Am Heart Assoc. 2018 Apr 13;7(8):e008643. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.008643. J Am Heart Assoc. 2018. PMID: 29654196 Free PMC article.
-
Effectiveness and Safety of Non-Vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant and Warfarin in Cirrhotic Patients With Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation.J Am Heart Assoc. 2019 Mar 5;8(5):e011112. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.011112. J Am Heart Assoc. 2019. PMID: 30834802 Free PMC article.
-
Direct comparative effectiveness and safety between non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants for stroke prevention in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.Eur J Epidemiol. 2019 Feb;34(2):173-190. doi: 10.1007/s10654-018-0415-7. Epub 2018 Jun 8. Eur J Epidemiol. 2019. PMID: 29948370
-
An indirect comparison of dabigatran, rivaroxaban and apixaban for atrial fibrillation.Thromb Haemost. 2012 Sep;108(3):476-84. doi: 10.1160/TH12-02-0093. Epub 2012 Jun 28. Thromb Haemost. 2012. PMID: 22740145 Review.
Cited by
-
Improving Anticoagulant Treatment Strategies of Atrial Fibrillation Using Reinforcement Learning.AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2021 Jan 25;2020:1431-1440. eCollection 2020. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2021. PMID: 33936519 Free PMC article.
-
To treat or not to treat: a comparative effectiveness analysis of oral anticoagulant outcomes among U.S. nursing home residents with atrial fibrillation.BMC Geriatr. 2024 Jul 19;24(1):619. doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-05186-9. BMC Geriatr. 2024. PMID: 39030486 Free PMC article.
-
Dabigatran Versus Rivaroxaban for Secondary Stroke Prevention in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation Rehabilitated in Skilled Nursing Facilities.Drugs Aging. 2018 Dec;35(12):1089-1098. doi: 10.1007/s40266-018-0610-y. Drugs Aging. 2018. PMID: 30421391 Free PMC article.
-
Hospital Resource Utilization and Costs Associated With Warfarin Versus Apixaban Treatment Among Patients Hospitalized for Venous Thromboembolism in the United States.Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2018 Dec;24(9_suppl):261S-268S. doi: 10.1177/1076029618800806. Epub 2018 Nov 15. Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2018. PMID: 30433823 Free PMC article.
-
Impact of the Health Insurance Coverage Policy on Oral Anticoagulant Prescription among Patients with Atrial Fibrillation in Korea from 2014 to 2016.J Korean Med Sci. 2018 May 9;33(23):e163. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2018.33.e163. eCollection 2018 Jun 4. J Korean Med Sci. 2018. PMID: 29853819 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical