Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Mar;21(2):204-212.
doi: 10.1007/s10120-017-0744-3. Epub 2017 Jun 27.

Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) score is a prognostic marker for gastric cancer patients after curative resection

Affiliations

Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) score is a prognostic marker for gastric cancer patients after curative resection

Daisuke Kuroda et al. Gastric Cancer. 2018 Mar.

Abstract

Background: Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT), as calculated from serum albumin, total cholesterol concentration, and total lymphocyte count, was previously shown to be useful for nutritional assessment. The current study investigated the potential use of CONUT as a prognostic marker in gastric cancer patients after curative resection.

Methods: Preoperative CONUT was retrospectively calculated in 416 gastric cancer patients who underwent curative resection at Kumamoto University Hospital from 2005 to 2014. The patients were divided into two groups: CONUT-high (≥4) and CONUT-low (≤3), according to time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. The associations of CONUT with clinicopathological factors and survival were evaluated.

Results: CONUT-high patients were significantly older (p < 0.001) and had a lower body mass index (p = 0.019), deeper invasion (p < 0.001), higher serum carcinoembryonic antigen (p = 0.037), and higher serum carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (p = 0.007) compared with CONUT-low patients. CONUT-high patients had significantly poorer overall survival (OS) compared with CONUT-low patients according to univariate and multivariate analyses (hazard ratio: 5.09, 95% confidence interval 3.12-8.30, p < 0.001). In time-dependent ROC analysis, CONUT had a higher area under the ROC curve (AUC) for the prediction of 5-year OS than the neutrophil lymphocyte ratio, the Modified Glasgow Prognostic Score, or pStage. When the time-dependent AUC curve was used to predict OS, CONUT tended to maintain its predictive accuracy for long-term survival at a significantly higher level for an extended period after surgery when compared with the other markers tested.

Conclusions: CONUT is useful for not only estimating nutritional status but also for predicting long-term OS in gastric cancer patients after curative resection.

Keywords: CONUT; Gastrectomy; Gastric cancer; Prognostic factor; Time-dependent ROC.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Medicine (Baltimore). 2014 Dec;93(27):e257 - PubMed
    1. Gastric Cancer. 2011 Jun;14(2):113-23 - PubMed
    1. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015 Sep 15;8(9):15222-9 - PubMed
    1. Br J Surg. 2012 Mar;99(3):346-55 - PubMed
    1. BMC Cancer. 2016 Sep 06;16:722 - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources