Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Jul 26;117(14):9804-9838.
doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00816. Epub 2017 Jun 28.

Challenges in the Greener Production of Formates/Formic Acid, Methanol, and DME by Heterogeneously Catalyzed CO2 Hydrogenation Processes

Affiliations

Challenges in the Greener Production of Formates/Formic Acid, Methanol, and DME by Heterogeneously Catalyzed CO2 Hydrogenation Processes

Andrea Álvarez et al. Chem Rev. .

Abstract

The recent advances in the development of heterogeneous catalysts and processes for the direct hydrogenation of CO2 to formate/formic acid, methanol, and dimethyl ether are thoroughly reviewed, with special emphasis on thermodynamics and catalyst design considerations. After introducing the main motivation for the development of such processes, we first summarize the most important aspects of CO2 capture and green routes to produce H2. Once the scene in terms of feedstocks is introduced, we carefully summarize the state of the art in the development of heterogeneous catalysts for these important hydrogenation reactions. Finally, in an attempt to give an order of magnitude regarding CO2 valorization, we critically assess economical aspects of the production of methanol and DME and outline future research and development directions.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Scope and aspects covered in this review.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Heterogeneous catalytic systems reported for the CO2 hydrogenation to formic acid/formates.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Immobilization strategies of molecular complexes on grafted solid support for CO2 hydrogenation. These “precatalyst” structures are created based on (a) refs (76) (n = 1,3), (75) (n = 2), and (77) (n = 3); (b) refs (−;) (c) ref (81); (d) refs (82) and (83); and (e) refs (, , and 85).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Immobilization of Ru/Ir molecular complexes on porous organic polymers. (a) Created after ref (89). (b) Adapted with permission from ref (90). Copyright 2015 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA. (c) Adapted with permission from ref (91). Copyright 2016 Elsevier.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Immobilization of an Ir complex on CTF-based spheres. Reproduced with permission from ref (98). Copyright 2016 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Proposed mechanism for reversible CO2 hydrogenation to formic acid using binuclear IrCp* catalyst with a thbpym ligand. Reproduced with permission from ref (65). Copyright 2012 Macmillan Publishers Ltd.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Mechanism of CO2 hydrogenation over supported Au nanoparticles. Reproduced with permission from ref (58). Copyright 2016 Elsevier.
Figure 8
Figure 8
Mechanism of CO2 hydrogenation over PdNi bimetallic surface. Reproduced with permission from ref (60). Copyright 2015 The Royal Society of Chemistry.
Figure 9
Figure 9
Chemical recycling of CO2 to methanol and DME.
Figure 10
Figure 10
Equilibrium CO2 conversion and methanol selectivity at different temperatures with initial H2/CO2 mixtures of 3 (left) and 10 (right), and at (a) 10 bar, (b) 30 bar, (c) 100 bar, (d) 200 bar, (e) 300 bar, (f) 400 bar, and (g) 500 bar. The calculation was performed with the same method as described in refs ( and 118).
Figure 11
Figure 11
Types of catalyst material reported for CO2 hydrogenation to methanol. The percentages have been calculated based on ca. 200 papers selected from a Scopus search from 2006 to 2016 on the principal catalyst materials.
Figure 12
Figure 12
Microstructural features revealed by TEM of Cu–ZnO–Al2O3 catalyst. Adapted with permission from ref (132). Copyright 2007 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA.
Figure 13
Figure 13
Synthesis methods of Cu–ZnO and Cu–ZnO–promoter catalysts. The percentage was calculated based on the publications over the past 10 years.
Figure 14
Figure 14
Simplified preparation procedure of Cu–ZnO or Cu–ZnO–Al2O3 via coprecipitation with widely used chemicals and resulting solid precursor phases.
Figure 15
Figure 15
Reported bed configurations of physically mixed catalysts in a fixed bed reactor.
Figure 16
Figure 16
Proposed reaction mechanisms for the CO2 hydrogenation toward methanol.
Figure 17
Figure 17
Proposed reaction mechanism of methanol dehydration to DME. Adapted with permission from ref (247). Copyright 2016 American Chemical Society.
Figure 18
Figure 18
Conversion profiles (upper panel, bold lines) and equilibrium curve (upper panel, thin lines) for three types of conventional methanol synthesis reactors (lower panels): (a) tubular boiling water reactor; (b) series quench reactor; (c) series adiabatic reactor with interstage cooling. Reproduced with permission from ref (135). Copyright 1997 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA.
Figure 19
Figure 19
Power requirements for water electrolysis (Pel), CO2 capture (Pcap), and compression of hydrogen (PcompH2) and CO2 (PcompCO2) at various reaction pressures in methanol synthesis by CO2 hydrogenation. Reprinted with permission ref (184). Copyright 2016 Elsevier.

References

    1. Princiotta F.Global Climate Change—The Technology Challenge; Springer: 2011; p 420.
    1. 2011 Technology Map of the European Strategic Energy Technology Plan (SET-Plan), 3rd ed.; European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Institute for Energy and Transport; © European Union: Luxembourg, 2011.
    1. The Global Status of CCS: 2011; The Global CCS Institute: Canberra, Australia, 2011.
    1. CCS EII Implementation Plan 2010–2012; Zero Emissions Platform: 2010.
    1. Rubin E. S.; Mantripragada H.; Marks A.; Versteeg P.; Kitchin J. The Outlook for Improved Carbon Capture Technology. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 2012, 38, 630–671. 10.1016/j.pecs.2012.03.003. - DOI