A LITERATURE REVIEW AND NEW DATA SUPPORTING AN INTERACTIVE ACCOUNT OF LETTER-BY-LETTER READING
- PMID: 28657524
- DOI: 10.1080/026432998381212
A LITERATURE REVIEW AND NEW DATA SUPPORTING AN INTERACTIVE ACCOUNT OF LETTER-BY-LETTER READING
Abstract
We present a theoretical account of letter-by-letter reading (LBL) that reconciles discrepant findings associated with this form of acquired dyslexia. We claim that LBL reading is caused by a deficit that affects the normal activation of the orthographic representation of the stimulus. In spite of this lower-level deficit, the degraded orthographic information may be processed further, and lexical, semantic, and higher-order orthographic information may still influence the reading patterns ofthese patients.In supportof our position, w e present a review of 57 published cases of LBL reading in w hich w e demonstrate that a peripheral deficit was evident in almost all of the patients and that, simultaneously, strong effects oflexical/ semantic variables were observed on reading performance. We then go on to report findings from an empirical analysis of seven LBL readers in whom w e document the joint effects of lexical variables (word frequency and im ageability) and word length on naming latency. We argue that the reading perform ance of these patients reflects the residual functioning of the same interactive system that supported normal reading premorbidly.
Similar articles
-
Inducing letter-by-letter dyslexia in normal readers.J Cogn Neurosci. 2006 Sep;18(9):1466-76. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2006.18.9.1466. J Cogn Neurosci. 2006. PMID: 16989548
-
PERCEPTUA.ND LEXICA.ACTORS IN A CAS.F LETTER-BY-LETTER READING.Cogn Neuropsychol. 1998 Mar 1;15(1-2):167-201. doi: 10.1080/026432998381258. Cogn Neuropsychol. 1998. PMID: 28657521
-
EXTENT AND LIMITS OF COVERT LEXICAL ACTIVATION IN LETTER-BY-LETTER READING.Cogn Neuropsychol. 1998 Mar 1;15(1-2):53-92. doi: 10.1080/026432998381221. Cogn Neuropsychol. 1998. PMID: 28657520
-
The word-length effect in reading: a review.Cogn Neuropsychol. 2014;31(5-6):378-412. doi: 10.1080/02643294.2014.895314. Epub 2014 Mar 26. Cogn Neuropsychol. 2014. PMID: 24665973 Review.
-
The neural signature of orthographic-phonological binding in successful and failing reading development.Neuroimage. 2011 Aug 1;57(3):695-703. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.11.003. Epub 2010 Nov 5. Neuroimage. 2011. PMID: 21056673 Review.
Cited by
-
Visual word processing engages a hierarchical, distributed, and bilateral cortical network.iScience. 2024 Jan 6;27(2):108809. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.108809. eCollection 2024 Feb 16. iScience. 2024. PMID: 38303718 Free PMC article.
-
Intact reading in patients with profound early visual dysfunction.Cortex. 2013 Oct;49(9):2294-306. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2013.01.009. Epub 2013 Feb 13. Cortex. 2013. PMID: 23578749 Free PMC article.
-
Reading without the left ventral occipito-temporal cortex.Neuropsychologia. 2012 Dec;50(14):3621-35. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.09.030. Epub 2012 Sep 25. Neuropsychologia. 2012. PMID: 23017598 Free PMC article.
-
Don't words come easy? A psychophysical exploration of word superiority.Front Hum Neurosci. 2013 Sep 4;7:519. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00519. eCollection 2013. Front Hum Neurosci. 2013. PMID: 24027510 Free PMC article.
-
Reading faces: investigating the use of a novel face-based orthography in acquired alexia.Brain Lang. 2014 Feb;129:7-13. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2013.11.005. Epub 2014 Jan 24. Brain Lang. 2014. PMID: 24463310 Free PMC article.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources