Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2017 Oct 15;42(20):E1204-E1211.
doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002296.

Do Occupational Risks for Low Back Pain Differ From Risks for Specific Lumbar Disc Diseases?: Results of the German Lumbar Spine Study (EPILIFT)

Annekatrin Bergmann  1 , Ulrich Bolm-Audorff  2 , Dirk Ditchen  3 , Rolf Ellegast  3 , Joachim Grifka  4 , Johannes Haerting  1 , Friedrich Hofmann  5 , Matthias Jäger  6 , Oliver Linhardt  4 , Alwin Luttmann  6 , Hans Jörg Meisel  7 , Martina Michaelis  8 , Gabriela Petereit-Haack  2 , Barbara Schumann  9 , Andreas Seidler  10
Affiliations
Comparative Study

Do Occupational Risks for Low Back Pain Differ From Risks for Specific Lumbar Disc Diseases?: Results of the German Lumbar Spine Study (EPILIFT)

Annekatrin Bergmann et al. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). .

Abstract

Study design: A multicenter, population based, case-control study.

Objective: The aim of the present analysis is to clarify potential differences in the "occupational risk profiles" of structural lumbar disc diseases on the one hand, and low back pain (LBP) on the other hand.

Summary of background data: Physical workplace factors seem to play an important etiological role.

Methods: We recruited 901 patients with structural lumbar disc diseases (disc herniation or severe disc space narrowing) and 233 control subjects with "low-back-pain." Both groups were compared with 422 "low-back pain free" control subjects. Case history, pain data, neurological deficits, and movement restrictions were documented. LBP was recorded by the Nordic questionnaire on musculoskeletal symptoms. All magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography, and X-rays were inspected by an independent study radiologist. The calculation of cumulative physical workload was based on a computer-assisted interview and a biomechanical analysis by 3-D-dynamic simulation tool. Occupational exposures were documented for the whole working life.

Results: We found a positive dose-response relationship between cumulative lumbar load and LBP among men, but not among women. Physical occupational risks for structural lumbar disc diseases [odds ratio (OR) 3.7; 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 2.3-6.0] are higher than for LBP (OR 1.9; 95% CI 1.0-3.5).

Conclusion: Our finding points to potentially different etiological pathways in the heterogeneous disease group of LBP. Results suggest that not all of the structural disc damage arising from physical workload leads to LBP.

Level of evidence: 4.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Burdorf A, Sorock G. Positive and negative evidence of risk factors for back disorders. Scand J Work Environ Health 1997; 23:243–256.
    1. Riihimäki H. Low-back pain, its origin and risk indicators. Scand J Work Environ Health 1991; 17:81–90.
    1. Lötters F, Burdorf A, Kuiper J, et al. Model for the work-relatedness of low-back-pain. Scand J Work Environ Health 2003; 29:431–440.
    1. Kelsey S, Githens PB, White AW. An epidemiologic study of lifting and twisting on the jobs and risk for acute prolapsed lumbar intervertebral disc. J Orthop Res 1984; 2:61–66.
    1. Steenstra IA, Verbeek JH, Heymans MW, et al. Prognostic factors for duration of sick leave in patients sick listed with acute low back pain: a systematic review of the literature. Occup Environ Med 2005; 62:851–860.

MeSH terms

Supplementary concepts