Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2017 Jun;96(26):e7212.
doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000007212.

Propofol decreases etomidate-related myoclonus in gastroscopy

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Propofol decreases etomidate-related myoclonus in gastroscopy

Jinfeng Liu et al. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Jun.

Abstract

Objective: Myoclonus, a common complication during intravenous induction with etomidate, is bothersome to both anesthesiologists and patients. This study explored the preventive effect of pretreatment with propofol on etomidate-related myoclonus.

Methods: This was a prospective, double-blind, clinical, randomized controlled study. Totally, 363 patients who were scheduled for a short-duration, painless gastrointestinal endoscopy were divided into 5 groups. Four groups received 0 mg/kg (E group), 0.25 mg/kg (LPE group), 0.50 mg/kg (MPE group), or 0.75 mg/kg (HPE group) propofol pretreatment before etomidate anesthesia. Another group only received 1 to 2 mg/kg of propofol (P group) as anesthesia. The incidence and severity of myoclonus, patient circulation and respiratory status, and intraoperative and postoperative complications were recorded.

Results: The incidence of myoclonus in the LPE group (26.8%), MPE group (16.4%), HPE group (14.9%), and P group (0) was lower than the E group (48.6%, P < .05). The incidence of grade 1, 2, and 3 of myoclonus in the LPE group, MPE group, HPE group, and P group was significantly lower than the E group, and that in the P group was lower than the LPE group (P < .05). The incidence of hypoxemia in the P group was higher than the E group, and the incidence of adverse events in the HPE group and P group was lower than the E group (P < .05).

Discussion: Pretreatment with propofol was feasible for preventing etomidate-related myoclonus. Furthermore, as propofol dosage increased, its effect on reducing the incidence and severity of myoclonic movements induced by etomidate increased.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors report no conflicts of interest.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Morgan M, Lumley J, Whitwam JG. Etomidate, a new water-soluble non-barbiturate intravenous induction agent. Lancet 1975;1:955–6. - PubMed
    1. Song JC, Lu ZJ, Jiao YF, et al. Etomidate anesthesia during ERCP caused more stable haemodynamic responses compared with propofol: a randomized clinical trial. Int J Med Sci 2015;12:559–65. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Shah SB, Chowdhury I, Bhargava AK, et al. Comparison of hemodynamic effects of intravenous etomidate versus propofol during induction and intubation using entropy guided hypnosis levels. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol 2015;31:180–5. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Yates AM, Wolfson AB, Shum L, et al. A descriptive study of myoclonus associated with etomidate procedural sedation in the ED. Am J Emerg Med 2013;31:852–4. - PubMed
    1. Hueter L, Schwarzkopf K, Simon M, et al. Pretreatment with sufentanil reduces myoclonus after etomidate. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2003;47:482–4. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms