Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Jun 28;17(1):105.
doi: 10.1186/s12886-017-0501-8.

Amblyopia treatment of adults with dichoptic training using the virtual reality oculus rift head mounted display: preliminary results

Affiliations

Amblyopia treatment of adults with dichoptic training using the virtual reality oculus rift head mounted display: preliminary results

Peter Žiak et al. BMC Ophthalmol. .

Abstract

Background: The gold standard treatments in amblyopia are penalizing therapies, such as patching or blurring vision with atropine that are aimed at forcing the use of the amblyopic eye. However, in the last years, new therapies are being developed and validated, such as dichoptic visual training, aimed at stimulating the amblyopic eye and eliminating the interocular supression.

Purpose: To evaluate the effect of dichoptic visual training using a virtual reality head mounted display in a sample of anisometropic amblyopic adults and to evaluate the potential usefulness of this option of treatment.

Methods: A total of 17 subjects (10 men, 7 women) with a mean age of 31.2 years (range, 17-69 year) and anisometropic amblyopia were enrolled. Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and stereoacuity (Stereo Randot graded circle test) changes were evaluated after 8 sessions (40 min per session) of dichoptic training with the computer game Diplopia Game (Vivid Vision) run in the Oculus Rift OC DK2 virtual reality head mounted display (Oculus VR).

Results: Mean BCVA in amblyopic eye improved significantly from a logMAR value of 0.58 ± 0.35 before training to a post-training value of 0.43 ± 0.38 (p < 0.01). Forty-seven percent of the participants achieved BCVA of 20/40 or better after the training as compared to 30% before the training. Mean stereoacuity changed from a value of 263.3 ± 135.1 before dichoptic training to a value of 176.7 ± 152.4 s of arc after training (p < 0.01). A total of 8 patients (47.1%) before dichoptic treatment had unmeasurable stereoacuity while this only occurred in 2 patients (11.8%) after training.

Conclusions: Dichoptic training using a virtual reality head mounted display seems to be an effective option of treatment in adults with anisometropic amblyopia. Future clinical trials are needed to confirm this preliminary evidence.

Trial registration: Trial ID: ISRCTN62086471 . Date registered: 13/06/2017. Retrospectively registered.

Keywords: Amblyopia; Dichoptic training; Oculus rift; Stereopsis; Virtual reality.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All participants in this study provided consent to participate. The parents or guardians provided consent for participants under the age of 18.

The study was approved by the Ethics Committe of Jessenius Medical School, Commenius University in Martin (date of approval: 08/03/2016; reference number: EK 1795/2016)

Consent for publication

Not applicable

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Oculus Rift DK2 setup. On the LCD screen what patient sees inside head mounted display is shown
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Example of the dichoptic training game seen through the oculus rift head mounted display in virtual reality. The amblyopic eye views the left half of the display in which the patient sees the correct color of the gates in order to flight spaceship throught the blue gates. Spaceship is seen only with the dominant eye, the right part of the figure
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Change in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) with the treatment for each patient evaluated
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Distribution of best corrected visual acuity data in the analyzed sample before and after visual traning
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Change in stereoacuity with the treatment for each patient evaluated
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Distribution of stereoacuity data in the analyzed sample before and after visual traning

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Holmes JM, Clarke MP. Amblyopia. Lancet. 2006;367(9519):1343–1351. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68581-4. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wiesel TN, Hubel DH. Comparison of the effects of unilateral and bilateral eye closure on cortical unit responses in kittens. J Neurophysiol. 1965;28:1029–1040. - PubMed
    1. Wu C, Hunter DG. Amblyopia: diagnostic and therapeutic options. Am J Ophthalmol. 2006;141:175–184. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2005.07.060. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Williams C, Northstone K, Harrad RA, Sparrow JM, Harvey I, Study Team ALSPAC. Amblyopia treatment outcomes after preschool screening v school entry screening: observational data from a prospective cohort study. Br J Ophthalmol. 2003;87:988–993. doi: 10.1136/bjo.87.8.988. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Loudon SE, Simonsz HJ. The history of the treatment of amblyopia. Strabismus. 2005;13:93–106. doi: 10.1080/09273970590949818. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms