Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Jun;13(6):20170156.
doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2017.0156.

Perception of animacy in dogs and humans

Affiliations

Perception of animacy in dogs and humans

Judit Abdai et al. Biol Lett. 2017 Jun.

Abstract

Humans have a tendency to perceive inanimate objects as animate based on simple motion cues. Although animacy is considered as a complex cognitive property, this recognition seems to be spontaneous. Researchers have found that young human infants discriminate between dependent and independent movement patterns. However, quick visual perception of animate entities may be crucial to non-human species as well. Based on general mammalian homology, dogs may possess similar skills to humans. Here, we investigated whether dogs and humans discriminate similarly between dependent and independent motion patterns performed by geometric shapes. We projected a side-by-side video display of the two patterns and measured looking times towards each side, in two trials. We found that in Trial 1, both dogs and humans were equally interested in the two patterns, but in Trial 2 of both species, looking times towards the dependent pattern decreased, whereas they increased towards the independent pattern. We argue that dogs and humans spontaneously recognized the specific pattern and habituated to it rapidly, but continued to show interest in the 'puzzling' pattern. This suggests that both species tend to recognize inanimate agents as animate relying solely on their motions.

Keywords: chasing; comparative perception; perceptual animacy; social perception.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

We declare we have no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Duration of looking at the chasing and independent patterns in Trials 1 and 2 by (a) dogs and (b) human participants. The boxplots indicate the median, 25th and 75th percentiles (boxes) and the minimum and maximum (whiskers).

References

    1. Heider F, Simmel M. 1944. An experimental study of apparent behavior. Am. J. Psychol. 57, 243–259. (10.2307/1416950) - DOI
    1. Bassili JN. 1976. Temporal and spatial contingencies in the perception of social events. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 33, 680–685. (10.1037/0022-3514.33.6.680) - DOI
    1. Tremoulet PD, Feldman J. 2000. Perception of animacy from the motion of a single object. Perception 29, 943–951. (10.1068/p3101) - DOI - PubMed
    1. Scholl BJ, Tremoulet PD. 2000. Perceptual causality and animacy. Trends Cogn. Sci. 4, 299–309. (10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01506-0) - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gao T, Newman GE, Scholl BJ. 2009. The psychophysics of chasing: a case study in the perception of animacy. Cogn. Psychol. 59, 154–179. (10.1016/j.cogpsych.2009.03.001) - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources