Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Feb 11:10132:101325Q.
doi: 10.1117/12.2254120. Epub 2017 Mar 9.

Real time implementation of anti-scatter grid artifact elimination method for high resolution x-ray imaging CMOS detectors using Graphics Processing Units (GPUs)

Affiliations

Real time implementation of anti-scatter grid artifact elimination method for high resolution x-ray imaging CMOS detectors using Graphics Processing Units (GPUs)

R Rana et al. Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng. .

Abstract

Scatter is one of the most important factors effecting image quality in radiography. One of the best scatter reduction methods in dynamic imaging is an anti-scatter grid. However, when used with high resolution imaging detectors these grids may leave grid-line artifacts with increasing severity as detector resolution improves. The presence of such artifacts can mask important details in the image and degrade image quality. We have previously demonstrated that, in order to remove these artifacts, one must first subtract the residual scatter that penetrates through the grid followed by dividing out a reference grid image; however, this correction must be done fast so that corrected images can be provided in real-time to clinicians. In this study, a standard stationary Smit-Rontgen x-ray grid (line density - 70 lines/cm, grid ratio - 13:1) was used with a high-resolution CMOS detector, the Dexela 1207 (pixel size - 75 micron) to image anthropomorphic head phantoms. For a 15 × 15 cm field-of-view (FOV), scatter profiles of the anthropomorphic head phantoms were estimated then iteratively modified to minimize the structured noise due to the varying grid-line artifacts across the FOV. Images of the head phantoms taken with the grid, before and after the corrections, were compared, demonstrating almost total elimination of the artifact over the full FOV. This correction is done fast using Graphics Processing Units (GPUs), with 7-8 iterations and total time taken to obtain the corrected image of only 87 ms, hence, demonstrating the virtually real-time implementation of the grid-artifact correction technique.

Keywords: CMOS detector; GPUs; anthropomorphic head phantoms; anti-scatter grid; grid artifacts; high resolution detector; iterative method; real time correction; scatter estimation; x-ray imaging.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1
Experimental set-up
Fig 2
Fig 2
External view of CMOS detector
Fig 3
Fig 3
RS-240T
Fig 4
Fig 4
PBU-50
Fig 5
Fig 5
Flowchart showing iteration process for finding correct scatter profile using GPU
Fig 6
Fig 6
RS-240T anthropomorphic head phantom imaged with the FPD. The selected region shows the portion of the head phantom imaged by the CMOS detector as shown in Fig 7.
Fig 7
Fig 7
RS-240T phantom imaged with grid attached to CMOS detector.
Fig 8
Fig 8
Final scatter distribution that was subtracted from Fig 7 to remove the residual anti-scatter grid lines (brighter indicates higher scatter).
Fig 9
Fig 9
(a) Object with grid, (b) Object with grid: Table and Grid corrected, (c) Object with grid – Table, Grid & Scatter corrected (d) Object without grid
Fig 10
Fig 10
(a) Object with grid, (b) Object with grid: Table and Grid corrected, (c) Object with grid – Table, Grid & Scatter corrected (d) Object without grid
Fig 11
Fig 11
PBU-50 anthropomorphic head phantom imaged with the FPD. The selected region shows the portion of the head phantom imaged by the CMOS detector as shown in Fig 12.
Fig 12
Fig 12
PBU-50 phantom imaged with grid attached to CMOS detector.
Fig 13
Fig 13
(a) Object with grid, (b) Object with grid: Table and Grid corrected, (c) Object with grid – Table, Grid & Scatter corrected (d) Object without grid
Fig 14
Fig 14
(a) Object with grid, (b) Object with grid: Table and Grid corrected, (c) Object with grid – Table, Grid & Scatter corrected (d) Object without grid

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Neitzel U. Grids or air gaps for scatter reduction in digital radiography: a model calculation. Medical physics. 1992;19(2):475–481. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1584148. - PubMed
    1. Barnes GT. Contrast and scatter in x-ray imaging. Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America Inc. 1991;11(2):307–323. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2028065. - PubMed
    1. Bednarek DR, Rudin S, Wong R. Artifacts produced by moving grids. Radiology. 1983;147(1):255–258. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6828740. - PubMed
    1. Rudin S, Bednarek DR, Hoffman KR. Endovascular image-guided interventions (EIGIs) Med Phys. 2008;35(1):301–309. http://www.pubmedcentral.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=2669303. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gauntt DM, Barnes GT. Grid line artifact formation: A comprehensive theory. Medical physics. 2006;33(6):1668–1677. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16872074. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources