Red blood cell transfusion policy: a critical literature review
- PMID: 28661855
- PMCID: PMC5490725
- DOI: 10.2450/2017.0059-17
Red blood cell transfusion policy: a critical literature review
Abstract
The issue of the most appropriate red blood cell transfusion policy has been addressed by a number of randomised controlled trials, conducted over the last decades, comparing the effects on patients' outcome of restrictive blood transfusion strategies (transfusing when the haemoglobin concentration is less than 7 g/dL to 8 g/dL) vs more liberal ones (transfusing when the haemoglobin concentration is less than 9 g/dL to 10 g/dL) in a variety of clinical settings. In parallel, various systematic reviews and meta-analyses have tried to perform pooled analyses of the data from these randomised controlled trials and their results have been utilised by scientific societies to provide recommendations and guidelines on red blood cell transfusion thresholds. All these aspects will be critically discussed in this narrative review.
Conflict of interest statement
GML is the Editor-in-Chief of Blood Transfusion and this manuscript has undergone additional external review as a result. The other Authors declare no conflicts of interest.
References
-
- Schmidt PJ, Ness PM. Hemotherapy: from bloodletting magic to transfusion therapy. Transfusion. 2006;46:166–8. - PubMed
-
- Vamvakas EC, Blajchman MA. Transfusion-related mortality: the ongoing risk of allogeneic blood transfusion and the available strategies for their prevention. Blood. 2009;113:3406–17. - PubMed
-
- Goodnough LT, Levy JH, Murphy MF. Concepts of blood transfusion in adults. Lancet. 2013;381:1845–54. - PubMed
-
- Hogshire L, Carson JL. Red blood cell transfusion: what is the evidence when to transfuse? Curr Opin Hematol. 2013;20:546–51. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical