Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Sep;38(9):1748-1753.
doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A5262. Epub 2017 Jun 29.

How Common Is Signal-Intensity Increase in Optic Nerve Segments on 3D Double Inversion Recovery Sequences in Visually Asymptomatic Patients with Multiple Sclerosis?

Affiliations

How Common Is Signal-Intensity Increase in Optic Nerve Segments on 3D Double Inversion Recovery Sequences in Visually Asymptomatic Patients with Multiple Sclerosis?

T Sartoretti et al. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2017 Sep.

Abstract

Background and purpose: In postmortem studies, subclinical optic nerve demyelination is very common in patients with MS but radiologic demonstration is difficult and mainly based on STIR T2WI. Our aim was to evaluate 3D double inversion recovery MR imaging for the detection of subclinical demyelinating lesions within optic nerve segments.

Materials and methods: The signal intensities in 4 different optic nerve segments (ie, retrobulbar, canalicular, prechiasmatic, and chiasm) were evaluated on 3D double inversion recovery MR imaging in 95 patients with MS without visual symptoms within the past 3 years and in 50 patients without optic nerve pathology. We compared the signal intensities with those of the adjacent lateral rectus muscle. The evaluation was performed by a student group and an expert neuroradiologist. Statistical evaluation (the Cohen κ test) was performed.

Results: On the 3D double inversion recovery sequence, optic nerve segments in the comparison group were all hypointense, and an isointense nerve sheath surrounded the retrobulbar nerve segment. At least 1 optic nerve segment was isointense or hyperintense in 68 patients (72%) in the group with MS on the basis of the results of the expert neuroradiologist. Student raters were able to correctly identify optic nerve hypersignal in 97%.

Conclusions: A hypersignal in at least 1 optic nerve segment on the 3D double inversion recovery sequence compared with hyposignal in optic nerve segments in the comparison group was very common in visually asymptomatic patients with MS. The signal-intensity rating of optic nerve segments could also be performed by inexperienced student readers.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig 1.
Fig 1.
On 3D DIR, bilaterally normal hypointense retrobulbar (A), canalicular (B), and prechiasmatic (C) optic nerve segments and a normal hypointense chiasm (D). The normal nerve segments are marked with white arrows. The normal hypointense retrobulbar optic nerve is surrounded by an isointense nerve sheath on 3D DIR (A).
Fig 2.
Fig 2.
Hyperintense susceptibility artifacts (white arrowheads) at the air-bone interface next to the canalicular nerve segments (A) and next to the prechiasmatic nerve segments (B). Optic nerve segments are marked with white arrows.
Fig 3.
Fig 3.
On 3D DIR, bilateral normal hypointense retrobulbar nerve segments (A) are compared with bilateral pathologic hyperintense retrobulbar nerve segments (B), with a unilateral pathologic hyperintense retrobulbar nerve segment on the left side (C) and a unilateral pathologic hyperintense canalicular nerve segment on the right side (D) in 3 different asymptomatic patients with MS. The hyperintense optic nerve segments are marked with white arrows. The normal hypointense optic nerve segments are marked with white arrowheads.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Wattjes MP, Rovira À, Miller D, et al. ; MAGNIMS study group. Evidence-based guidelines: MAGNIMS consensus guidelines on the use of MRI in multiple sclerosis—establishing disease prognosis and monitoring patients. Nat Rev Neurol 2015;11:597–606 10.1038/nrneurol.2015.157 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Polman CH, Reingold SC, Edan G, et al. . Diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: 2005 revisions to the “McDonald Criteria.” Ann Neurol 2005;58:840–46 10.1002/ana.20703 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Polman CH, Reingold SC, Banwell B, et al. . Diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: 2010 revisions to the McDonald criteria. Ann Neurol 2011;69:292–302 10.1002/ana.22366 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Swanton JK, Rovira A, Tintore M, et al. . MRI criteria for multiple sclerosis in patients presenting with clinically isolated syndromes: a multicentre retrospective study. Lancet Neurol 2007;6:677–86 10.1016/S1474-4422(07)70176-X - DOI - PubMed
    1. McDonald WI, Compston A, Edan G, et al. . Recommended diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: guidelines from the International Panel on the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol 2001;50:121–27 10.1002/ana.1032 - DOI - PubMed