Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2018 Jan;32(1):315-327.
doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5679-6. Epub 2017 Jun 29.

Vacuum-assisted early transanal closure of leaking low colorectal anastomoses: the CLEAN study

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Vacuum-assisted early transanal closure of leaking low colorectal anastomoses: the CLEAN study

W A A Borstlap et al. Surg Endosc. 2018 Jan.

Abstract

Introduction: Non-healing of anastomotic leakage can be observed in up to 50% after total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. This study investigates the efficacy of early transanal closure of anastomotic leakage after pre-treatment with the Endosponge® therapy.

Methods: In this prospective, multicentre, feasibility study, transanal suturing of the anastomotic defect was performed after vacuum-assisted cleaning of the presacral cavity. Primary outcome was the proportion of patients with a healed anastomosis at 6 months after transanal closure. Secondary, healing at last follow-up, continuity, direct medical costs, functionality and quality of life were analysed.

Results: Between July 2013 and July 2015, 30 rectal cancer patients with a leaking low colorectal anastomosis were included, of whom 22 underwent neoadjuvant radiotherapy. Median follow-up was 14 (7-29) months. At 6 months, the anastomosis had healed in 16 (53%) patients. At last follow-up, anastomotic integrity was found in 21 (70%) and continuity was restored in 20 (67%) patients. Non-healing at 12 months was observed in 10/29 (34%) patients overall, and in 3/14 (21%) when therapy started within three weeks following the index operation. Major LARS was reported in 12/15 (80%) patients. The direct medical costs were €8933 (95% CI 7268-10,707) per patient.

Conclusion: Vacuum-assisted early transanal closure of a leaking anastomosis after total mesorectal excision with 73% preoperative radiotherapy showed that acceptable anastomotic healing rates and stoma reversal rates can be achieved. Early diagnosis and start of treatment seems crucial.

Keywords: Anastomotic leakage; Rectal cancer; Transanal closure; Vacuum therapy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

W.A.A. Borstlap, G.D. Musters, L.P.S. Stassen, H.L. van Westreenen, D. Hess, S. van Dieren, S. Festen, E.J. van der Zaag, P.J. Tanis and W.A. Bemelman have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Treatment flow chart of patients with anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection that underwent a vacuum-assisted early closure strategy
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Study flow chart
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Treatment strategies for patient with a non-healed anastomosis at routine sigmoidoscopy two weeks after transanal closure of the anastomotic defect
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Patient with a large dehiscence of the anastomosis that underwent successful treatment. A First sigmoidoscopy showing a 270 degrees dehiscence of the anastomosis with a transanal drain that was placed in the referring hospital. B Sigmoidoscopy image after two Endosponge® procedures, showing granulation tissue with pus on the right side of the descending colon. C Image after the fifth Endosponge® procedure showing a clean cavity with granulation tissue. D Two weeks follow-up sigmoidoscopy after transanal closure showing a reduced dehiscence, but with a residual defect. E Small residual sinus after a total of 8 Endosponge® exchanges for a residual defect after transanal closure. F Sigmoidoscopy two week after the last Endosponge® procedure, showing a healed anastomosis

References

    1. Heald RJ, Ryall RD. Recurrence and survival after total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Lancet. 1986;1(8496):1479–1482. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(86)91510-2. - DOI - PubMed
    1. McDermott FD, Heeney A, Kelly ME, Steele RJ, Carlson GL, Winter DC. Systematic review of preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative risk factors for colorectal anastomotic leaks. Br J Surg. 2015;102(5):462–479. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9697. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Vermeer TA, Orsini RG, Daams F, Nieuwenhuijzen GA, Rutten HJ. Anastomotic leakage and presacral abscess formation after locally advanced rectal cancer surgery: incidence, risk factors and treatment. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2014;40(11):1502–1509. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2014.03.019. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Trencheva K, Morrissey KP, Wells M, Mancuso CA, Lee SW, Sonoda T, et al. Identifying important predictors for anastomotic leak after colon and rectal resection: prospective study on 616 patients. Ann Surg. 2013;257(1):108–113. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318262a6cd. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hallbook O, Sjodahl R. Anastomotic leakage and functional outcome after anterior resection of the rectum. Br J Surg. 1996;83(1):60–62. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800830119. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

Grants and funding

LinkOut - more resources