Assessing the Therapeutic Utility of Professional Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Type 2 Diabetes Across Various Therapies: A Retrospective Evaluation
- PMID: 28667580
- DOI: 10.1007/s12325-017-0576-x
Assessing the Therapeutic Utility of Professional Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Type 2 Diabetes Across Various Therapies: A Retrospective Evaluation
Abstract
Background: There have been few large studies that have analyzed the effect of professional (masked) continuous glucose monitoring (P-CGM) on glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) who were on a broad spectrum of baseline therapies.
Methods: We performed a retrospective, blinded evaluation of glycemic control in 296 T2DM adults for 6 months following a 6- to 7-day study of their glycemic profile using masked P-CGM. At baseline, 91% of the patients were on some form of insulin treatment with oral hypoglycemic agents (OHA), while 7% were on one or more OHAs without insulin, and the remaining 2% were on GLP-1RAs. On the basis of the masked CGM profile, patients were counselled on diet and exercise change(s) in their baseline diabetes therapy by our professionally trained diabetes team. They also continued to receive regular treatment advice and dose titrations through our Diabetes Tele-Management System (DTMS®). The baseline changes in hemoglobin A1C (A1C) observed in these patients after 6 months of undergoing P-CGM was compared to a matched control group.
Results: P-CGM revealed that the predominant pattern of hyperglycemia was postprandial while previously unknown hypoglycemia was found in 38% of the patients; over half of the cases of hypoglycemia were nocturnal. The mean A1C of the P-CGM group dropped from 7.5 ± 1.4% at baseline vs. 7.0 ± 0.9% at 6 months (p < 0.0001). The frequency of performing self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) was also found to be significantly increased in these patients from the baseline. Meanwhile, no significant improvement in A1C was noted in the control group during the same time frame (7.7 ± 1.1% at baseline vs. 7.4 ± 1.1% at 6 months; p = 0.0663) and frequency of SMBG remained almost unchanged.
Conclusions: P-CGM can provide actionable data and motivate patients for diabetes self-care practices, resulting in an improvement in glycemic control over a wide range of baseline therapies.
Keywords: A1C; Continuous glucose monitoring; Hypoglycemia; Postprandial hyperglycemia; Therapy change; Type 2 diabetes.
Similar articles
-
Association of Real-time Continuous Glucose Monitoring With Glycemic Control and Acute Metabolic Events Among Patients With Insulin-Treated Diabetes.JAMA. 2021 Jun 8;325(22):2273-2284. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.6530. JAMA. 2021. PMID: 34077502 Free PMC article.
-
The effect of real-time continuous glucose monitoring on glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2011 May 1;5(3):668-75. doi: 10.1177/193229681100500320. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2011. PMID: 21722581 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Treatment recommendations following 3-day masked continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) in youth with type 1 diabetes.J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2014 May;8(3):494-7. doi: 10.1177/1932296814528135. Epub 2014 Mar 22. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2014. PMID: 24876612 Free PMC article.
-
Continuous Glucose Monitoring: A Review of Recent Studies Demonstrating Improved Glycemic Outcomes.Diabetes Technol Ther. 2017 Jun;19(S3):S25-S37. doi: 10.1089/dia.2017.0035. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2017. PMID: 28585879 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Effectiveness of Continuous Glucose Monitoring on Metrics of Glycemic Control in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2024 Mar 15;109(4):1119-1131. doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgad652. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2024. PMID: 37987208
Cited by
-
Continuous Glucose Monitoring Versus Self-monitoring of Blood Glucose in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review with Meta-analysis.Cureus. 2019 Sep 12;11(9):e5634. doi: 10.7759/cureus.5634. Cureus. 2019. PMID: 31700737 Free PMC article.
-
Effectiveness of continuous glucose monitoring in patient management of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: an umbrella review of systematic reviews from 2011 to 2024.Arch Public Health. 2024 Dec 2;82(1):231. doi: 10.1186/s13690-024-01459-2. Arch Public Health. 2024. PMID: 39623499 Free PMC article.
-
"Something Tells Me I Can't Do That No More": Experiences With Real-Time Glucose and Activity Monitoring Among Underserved Black Women With Type 2 Diabetes.Sci Diabetes Self Manag Care. 2022 Apr;48(2):78-86. doi: 10.1177/26350106221076042. Epub 2022 Feb 4. Sci Diabetes Self Manag Care. 2022. PMID: 35118920 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
A new interventional home care model for COVID management: Virtual Covid IP.Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2021 Sep-Oct;15(5):102228. doi: 10.1016/j.dsx.2021.102228. Epub 2021 Jul 23. Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2021. PMID: 34330071 Free PMC article.
-
GP-OSMOTIC trial protocol: an individually randomised controlled trial to determine the effect of retrospective continuous glucose monitoring (r-CGM) on HbA1c in adults with type 2 diabetes in general practice.BMJ Open. 2018 Jul 17;8(7):e021435. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-021435. BMJ Open. 2018. PMID: 30018097 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical