Advancing Alternative Analysis: Integration of Decision Science
- PMID: 28669940
- PMCID: PMC5743447
- DOI: 10.1289/EHP483
Advancing Alternative Analysis: Integration of Decision Science
Abstract
Background: Decision analysis-a systematic approach to solving complex problems-offers tools and frameworks to support decision making that are increasingly being applied to environmental challenges. Alternatives analysis is a method used in regulation and product design to identify, compare, and evaluate the safety and viability of potential substitutes for hazardous chemicals.
Objectives: We assessed whether decision science may assist the alternatives analysis decision maker in comparing alternatives across a range of metrics.
Methods: A workshop was convened that included representatives from government, academia, business, and civil society and included experts in toxicology, decision science, alternatives assessment, engineering, and law and policy. Participants were divided into two groups and were prompted with targeted questions. Throughout the workshop, the groups periodically came together in plenary sessions to reflect on other groups' findings.
Results: We concluded that the further incorporation of decision science into alternatives analysis would advance the ability of companies and regulators to select alternatives to harmful ingredients and would also advance the science of decision analysis.
Conclusions: We advance four recommendations: a) engaging the systematic development and evaluation of decision approaches and tools; b) using case studies to advance the integration of decision analysis into alternatives analysis; c) supporting transdisciplinary research; and d) supporting education and outreach efforts. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP483.
Figures



References
-
- Adelman L, Gualtieri J, Stanford S. 1995. Examining the effect of causal focus on the option generation process: An experiment using protocol analysis. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 61:54–66, 10.1006/obhd.1995.1005. - DOI
-
- Ascough JC, Maier HR, Ravalico JK, Strudley MW. 2008. Future research challenges for incorporation of uncertainty in environmental and ecological decision-making. Ecol Modell 219:383–399, 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2008.07.015. - DOI
-
- Bell DVJ. 2009. Education for Sustainable Development: Cure Or Placebo? In: Innovation, Science, Environmental, Special Edition: Charting Sustainable Development in Canada 1987–2007. Toner G, Meadowcroft J, eds. Montreal, Quebec, Canada: McGill-Queen’s University Press, 106–130.
-
- Belton V, Stewart TJ. 2002. Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: An Integrated Approach. Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
-
- BizNGO. 2016. The Commons Principles for Alternatives Assessment. http://www.bizngo.org/alternatives-assessment/commons-principles-alt-ass... [accessed August 22, 2016].