Patient-tailored aortic root repair in adult marfanoid patients: Surgical considerations and outcomes
- PMID: 28673709
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2017.05.108
Patient-tailored aortic root repair in adult marfanoid patients: Surgical considerations and outcomes
Abstract
Objective: The aim of the study was to evaluate the operative and functional results after individual, patient-tailored aortic root repair in marfanoid patients.
Methods: Among 518 patients who underwent operation between 2002 and January 2016, using patient-tailored aortic root repair with isolated sinus replacement, 42 patients fulfilled the original Ghent criteria. None/trivial, mild, moderate, and severe insufficiency grades were present in 5, 16, 10, and 11 patients, respectively.
Results: The repair was adjusted to the existing aortic annulus diameter. Replacement of 1, 2, or 3 sinuses of Valsalva was performed in 1, 14, and 27 patients, respectively. Concomitant cusp repair was performed in 17 patients (40.5%), and 10 patients (23.8%) underwent arch repair (total in 3). All patients survived surgery, and the follow-up (mean, 6.1 ± 3.1; range, 0.8-14.2 years) was 100% complete. No patient had a change in the form or size of the aortic neo-root, especially the size of aortic annulus and sinotubular junction during the follow-up time. No and trivial/mild insufficiency were present in 22 and 18 patients, respectively, and 2 patients with recurrent aortic insufficiency caused by cusp pathology underwent aortic valve replacement 43 and 66 months after the primary surgery, respectively. Thus, the estimated survival free from aortic valve/root reoperation for any reason at 5 and 8 years was 96.8% ± 3.2% and 91.4% ± 6.0%, respectively.
Conclusions: Patient-tailored root repair using isolated sinus replacement is an effective and durable method of valve-sparing repair in select marfanoid patients with a satisfactory quality of aortic cusps, which seems to be decisive for long-term valve function.
Keywords: Marfan syndrome; aortic root remodeling; aortic valve reconstruction; valve-sparing root repair.
Copyright © 2017 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
Reimplantation for Marfan syndrome: If it ain't broke….J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018 Jan;155(1):52-53. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2017.08.085. Epub 2017 Sep 5. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018. PMID: 28969850 No abstract available.
-
Aortic repair in Marfan syndrome: Let's not forget the arch when talking about the root.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018 Jul;156(1):38-39.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2018.03.046. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018. PMID: 29921099 No abstract available.
-
Reply to "Aortic repair in Marfan Syndrome: Let's not forget the arch when talking about the root".J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018 Jul;156(1):39-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2018.03.117. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018. PMID: 29921100 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Reimplantation valve-sparing aortic root replacement in Marfan syndrome using the Valsalva conduit: an intercontinental multicenter study.Ann Thorac Surg. 2007 Feb;83(2):S769-73; discussion S785-90. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2006.10.084. Ann Thorac Surg. 2007. PMID: 17257924
-
Long-term outcomes after aortic root repair using selective sinus replacement.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2023 Aug;166(2):422-431.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2021.09.034. Epub 2021 Sep 25. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2023. PMID: 34657715
-
Aortic annulus does not dilate over time after aortic root remodeling with or without annuloplasty.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018 Mar;155(3):885-894.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2017.10.074. Epub 2017 Dec 6. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018. PMID: 29221734
-
Aortic valve reconstruction: current status.Herz. 2010 Mar;35(2):88-93. doi: 10.1007/s00059-010-3325-3. Herz. 2010. PMID: 20376642 Review.
-
Root repair with aortic ring annuloplasty using the standard approach.J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2021 Feb;62(1):12-18. doi: 10.23736/S0021-9509.20.11690-2. Epub 2020 Nov 13. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2021. PMID: 33185078 Review.
Cited by
-
Aortic valve repair with a newly approved geometric annuloplasty ring in patients undergoing proximal aortic repair: early results from a single-centre experience.Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2020 Jun 1;57(6):1137-1144. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezaa009. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2020. PMID: 32011669 Free PMC article.
-
Root repair in patient with huge sinus Valsalva aneurysm and severe aortic regurgitation.Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2020 May;68(5):530-533. doi: 10.1007/s11748-019-01104-8. Epub 2019 Mar 13. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2020. PMID: 30868369
-
Twenty-year follow-up after valve-sparing aortic root replacement with the Yacoub or David procedure in Marfan patients.JTCVS Open. 2021 Jul 21;7:47-49. doi: 10.1016/j.xjon.2021.07.013. eCollection 2021 Sep. JTCVS Open. 2021. PMID: 36003717 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Systematic review and meta-analysis of surgical outcomes in Marfan patients undergoing aortic root surgery by composite-valve graft or valve sparing root replacement.Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2017 Nov;6(6):570-581. doi: 10.21037/acs.2017.11.06. Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2017. PMID: 29270369 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Redo Aortic Root Operations in Patients with Marfan Syndrome.Int J Angiol. 2018 Jun;27(2):92-97. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1649485. Epub 2018 May 17. Int J Angiol. 2018. PMID: 29896041 Free PMC article. Review.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical