Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Jul;38(7):733-737.
doi: 10.15537/smj.2017.7.18643.

Prostate cancer screening in a low prevalence population. Is it worth it?

Affiliations

Prostate cancer screening in a low prevalence population. Is it worth it?

Mostafa A Arafa et al. Saudi Med J. 2017 Jul.

Abstract

Objectives: To embrace a national screening program for prostate cancer, putting into consideration the cost, and the attitude of the general population towards such screening.

Methods: Men aged greater than 45 and less than 70 years were invited to participate in the current prospective study conducted at King Saud University Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia between December 2014 and July 2015. Those with confirmed high prostate-specific antigen (PSA) (≥4 ng/ml) were referred to the urology clinic, then subjected to magnetic resonance imaging.

Results: The total cohort screened were 2898, we found 118 cases with high PSA (≥4 ng/ml). Fifty-two cases (60.4%) were confirmed high PSA. All of them were subjected to MRI and biopsy. The confirmed prostate cancer were 7 cases (0.24%). The age of confirmed prostate cancer cases ranged from 49 years to 68 years, Gleason score for 4 cases was low grade (3+3), while it was 3+4 for 2 cases, and only one case had advanced cancer (3+5). Approximately 12% of cases with high PSA did not show up for confirmation of their results for further examination.

Conclusions: The present study recommends against mass screening among Saudi population; however, men before 50 years of age should start PSA blood testing until before 70 years after discussing the benefits and harms of such screening through shared decision making.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Consort flow diagram.

References

    1. World Health Organization. Early detection of cancer. [Accessed 2017 January 10]. from URL: http://www.who.int/cancer/detection/en/
    1. Moyer VA. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for prostate cancer:U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med. 2012;157:120–134. - PubMed
    1. Chou R, Croswell JM, Dana T, Bougatsos C, Blazina I, Fu R, et al. Screening for prostate cancer:a review of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med. 2011;155:762–771. - PubMed
    1. Resnick MJ, Koyama T, Fan KH, Albertsen PC, Goodman M, Hamilton AS, et al. Long-term functional outcomes after treatment for localized prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2013;368:436–445. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Johansson E, Steineck G, Holmberg L, Johansson J, Nyberg T, et al. Long-term quality-of-life outcomes after radical prostatectomy or watchful waiting:the Scandinavian Prostate Cancer Group-4 randomised trial. Lancet Oncol. 2011;12:891–899. - PubMed

Substances