Adverse events during CT colonography for screening, diagnosis and preoperative staging of colorectal cancer: a Japanese national survey
- PMID: 28674967
- DOI: 10.1007/s00330-017-4920-y
Adverse events during CT colonography for screening, diagnosis and preoperative staging of colorectal cancer: a Japanese national survey
Abstract
Objectives: To retrospectively evaluate the frequencies and magnitudes of adverse events associated with computed tomographic colonography (CTC) for screening, diagnosis and preoperative staging of colorectal cancer.
Methods: A Japanese national survey on CTC was administered by use of an online survey tool in the form of a questionnaire. The questions covered mortality, colorectal perforation, vasovagal reaction, total number of examinations, and examination procedures. The survey data was collated and raw frequencies were determined. Fisher's exact test was used to determine differences in event rates between groups.
Results: At 431 institutions, 147,439 CTC examinations were performed. No deaths were reported. Colorectal perforations occurred in 0.014% (21/147,439): 0.003% (1/29,823) in screening, 0.014% (13/91,007) in diagnosis and 0.028% (7/25,330) in preoperative staging. The perforation risk was significantly lower in screening than in preoperative staging CTC procedures (p = 0.028). Eighty-one per cent of perforation cases (17/21) did not require emergency surgery. Vasovagal reaction occurred in 0.081% (120/147,439): 0.111% (33/29,823) in screening, 0.088% (80/91,007) in diagnosis and 0.028% (7/25,330) in preoperative staging.
Conclusions: The risk of colorectal perforation and vasovagal reaction in CTC is low. The frequency of colorectal perforation associated with CTC is least in the screening group and greatest in the preoperative-staging group.
Key points: • The colorectal perforation rate during preoperative-staging CTC was 0.028 %. • The perforation rates for screening and diagnosis were 0.003 % and 0.014 %, respectively. • The perforation risk is significantly lower in screening than in preoperative staging. • Eighty-one per cent of perforation cases did not require emergency surgery. • Use of an automatic colon insufflator can reduce the risk of bowel perforation.
Keywords: Colonography; Computed tomography; Intestinal perforation; Vasovagal syncope; Virtual colonoscopy.
Similar articles
-
Adverse events of computed tomography colonography: an Italian National Survey.Dig Liver Dis. 2013 Aug;45(8):645-50. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2013.02.020. Epub 2013 May 2. Dig Liver Dis. 2013. PMID: 23643567
-
Vasovagal reactions in CT colonography.Abdom Imaging. 2007 Sep-Oct;32(5):552-5. doi: 10.1007/s00261-006-9055-6. Epub 2007 Jun 1. Abdom Imaging. 2007. PMID: 17938996
-
Potentially serious adverse events at CT colonography in symptomatic patients: national survey of the United Kingdom.Radiology. 2006 May;239(2):464-71. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2392051101. Epub 2006 Mar 28. Radiology. 2006. PMID: 16569789
-
Role of preoperative CT colonography in patients with colorectal cancer.World J Gastroenterol. 2014 Apr 14;20(14):3795-803. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i14.3795. World J Gastroenterol. 2014. PMID: 24744573 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Should computed tomographic colonography replace optical colonoscopy in screening for colorectal cancer?Pol Arch Med Wewn. 2009 Apr;119(4):236-41. Pol Arch Med Wewn. 2009. PMID: 19413183 Review.
Cited by
-
Recent trends in the prevalence and distribution of colonic diverticula in Japan evaluated using computed tomography colonography.World J Gastroenterol. 2021 Jul 21;27(27):4441-4452. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v27.i27.4441. World J Gastroenterol. 2021. PMID: 34366615 Free PMC article.
-
Virtual monoenergetic dual-layer dual-energy CT images in colorectal cancer: CT diagnosis could be improved?Radiol Med. 2023 Aug;128(8):891-899. doi: 10.1007/s11547-023-01663-0. Epub 2023 Jun 13. Radiol Med. 2023. PMID: 37310558
-
Imaging alternatives to colonoscopy: CT colonography and colon capsule. European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) and European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR) Guideline - Update 2020.Eur Radiol. 2021 May;31(5):2967-2982. doi: 10.1007/s00330-020-07413-4. Eur Radiol. 2021. PMID: 33104846 Review.
-
Circulating Tumour Cells, Circulating Tumour DNA and Circulating Tumour miRNA in Blood Assays in the Different Steps of Colorectal Cancer Management, a Review of the Evidence in 2019.Biomed Res Int. 2019 Dec 4;2019:5953036. doi: 10.1155/2019/5953036. eCollection 2019. Biomed Res Int. 2019. PMID: 31930130 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The potential of CT colonography for colorectal cancer screening in Japan.Jpn J Radiol. 2025 May 10. doi: 10.1007/s11604-025-01798-2. Online ahead of print. Jpn J Radiol. 2025. PMID: 40347404 Review.
References
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical