Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2017 Sep;53(3):363-372.
doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2017.05.010. Epub 2017 Jul 1.

Patient Navigation for Colonoscopy Completion: Results of an RCT

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Patient Navigation for Colonoscopy Completion: Results of an RCT

Amy DeGroff et al. Am J Prev Med. 2017 Sep.

Abstract

Introduction: Colorectal cancer is a leading cause of cancer-related death in the U.S. Although screening reduces colorectal cancer incidence and mortality, screening rates among U.S. adults remain less than optimal, especially among disadvantaged populations. This study examined the efficacy of patient navigation to increase colonoscopy screening.

Study design: RCT.

Setting/participants: A total of 843 low-income adults, primarily Hispanic and non-Hispanic blacks, aged 50-75 years referred for colonoscopy at Boston Medical Center were randomized into the intervention (n=429) or control (n=427) groups. Participants were enrolled between September 2012 and December 2014, with analysis following through 2015.

Intervention: Two bilingual lay navigators provided individualized education and support to reduce patient barriers and facilitate colonoscopy completion. The intervention was delivered largely by telephone.

Main outcome measure: Colonoscopy completion within 6 months of study enrollment.

Results: Colonoscopy completion was significantly higher for navigated patients (61.1%) than control group patients receiving usual care (53.2%, p=0.021). Based on regression analysis, the odds of completing a colonoscopy for navigated patients was one and a half times greater than for controls (95% CI=1.12, 2.03, p=0.007). There were no differences between navigated and control groups in regard to adequacy of bowel preparation (95.3% vs 97.3%, respectively).

Conclusions: Navigation significantly improved colonoscopy screening completion among a racially diverse, low-income population. Results contribute to mounting evidence demonstrating the efficacy of patient navigation in increasing colorectal cancer screening. Screening can be further enhanced when navigation is combined with other evidence-based practices implemented in healthcare systems and the community.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Study participant referral, enrollment, and study group randomization.

References

    1. DHHS, CDC, National Cancer Institute. U.S. Cancer Statistics. https://nccd.cdc.gov/uscs/. Accessed July 1, 2016.
    1. Whitlock EP, Lin JS, Liles E, Beil TL, Fu R. Screening for colorectal cancer: a targeted updated systematic review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med. 2008;149(9):638–658. 10.7326/0003-4819-149-9-200811040-00245. - DOI - PubMed
    1. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Final update summary: colorectal cancer: screening. www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/Page/Document/UpdateSummaryFinal/c.... Published July 2015. Accessed January 27, 2016.
    1. CDC. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Survey Data. Atlanta, GA: U.S. DHHS, CDC, 2014. www.cdc.gov/brfss/index.html. Accessed January 27, 2016.
    1. Lasser KE, Ayanian JZ, Fletcher RH, Good MJ. Barriers to colorectal cancer screening in community health centers: a qualitative study. BMC Fam Pract. 2008;9:15. 10.1186/1471-2296-9-15. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms