Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Jun 30;5(3):E535-E539.
doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20170010.

Outcomes in a nurse-led peripherally inserted central catheter program: a retrospective cohort study

Affiliations

Outcomes in a nurse-led peripherally inserted central catheter program: a retrospective cohort study

Sheryl McDiarmid et al. CMAJ Open. .

Abstract

Background: Peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) provide enormous benefit to patients. However, recent publications have highlighted relatively high PICC-associated complication rates. We report on patient and device outcomes from a nurse-led program.

Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of a prospective cohort of consecutive patients undergoing PICC insertion at The Ottawa Hospital between Jan. 1, 2013 and Dec. 31, 2014. Of the 8314 BioFlo PASV PICCs inserted, we randomly selected a sample of 700 and obtained a complete data set for 656. We measured the cumulative incidence of major complications (catheter-related bloodstream infections and deep vein thrombosis) and use of a thrombolytic to alleviate occlusions.

Results: The total number of catheter days was 58 486, and the median dwell time 45 days. We observed 4 cases of catheter-related bloodstream infection (0.6% [95% CI 0.17%-1.55%]) (0.07/1000 catheter days). Ten patients (1.5% [95% CI 0.83%-2.78%]) (0.17/1000 catheter days) had catheter-related deep venous thrombosis. At least 1 dose of thrombolytic was required in 75 catheters (11.4% [95% CI 8.61%-13.39]), 31 (7.1%) of the 436 single-lumen catheters and 113 (25.7%) of the 440 lumina of dual-lumen catheters (p < 0.001).

Interpretation: We attribute our low rates of major complications to a nurse-led expert insertion team, standardized care and maintenance protocols, high insertion volumes, novel catheter material and continuous quality-improvement initiatives that are implemented and evaluated regularly. We conclude that the considerable benefits PICCs provide to patients are attained with a low risk of major complications.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: AngioDynamics partly funded this study through a research agreement administered by the Ottawa Hospital Research Institute. Sheryl McDiarmid has given invited lectures for AngioDynamics, Bard and Teleflex-Arrow. No other competing interests were declared.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Moureau N. Vascular safety: it's all about PICCs. Nurs Manage. 2006;37:22–7. - PubMed
    1. Ng PK, Ault MJ, Ellrodt AG, et al. Peripherally inserted central catheters in general medicine. Mayo Clin Proc. 1997;72:225–33. - PubMed
    1. Chopra V, Anand S, Krein SL, et al. Bloodstream infection, venous thrombosis, and peripherally inserted central catheters: reappraising the evidence. Am J Med. 2012;125:733–41. - PubMed
    1. Guerin K, Wagner J, Reins K, et al. Reduction in central line-associated bloodstream infections by implementation of a postinsertion care bundle. Am J Infect Control. 2010;38:430–3. - PubMed
    1. Timsit JF, Bouadma L, Ruckly S, et al. Dressing disruption is a major risk factor for catheter-related infections. Crit Care Med. 2012;40:1707–14. - PubMed