Impact of the North American Free Trade Agreement on high-fructose corn syrup supply in Canada: a natural experiment using synthetic control methods
- PMID: 28676578
- PMCID: PMC5495638
- DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.161152
Impact of the North American Free Trade Agreement on high-fructose corn syrup supply in Canada: a natural experiment using synthetic control methods
Abstract
Background: Critics of free trade agreements have argued that they threaten public health, as they eliminate barriers to trade in potentially harmful products, such as sugar. Here we analyze the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), testing the hypothesis that lowering tariffs on food and beverage syrups that contain high-fructose corn syrup (HFCS) increased its use in foods consumed in Canada.
Methods: We used supply data from the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations to assess changes in supply of caloric sweeteners including HFCS after NAFTA. We estimate the impact of NAFTA on supply of HFCS in Canada using an innovative, quasi-experimental methodology - synthetic control methods - that creates a control group with which to compare Canada's outcomes. Additional robustness tests were performed for sample, control groups and model specification.
Results: Tariff reductions in NAFTA coincided with a 41.6 (95% confidence interval 25.1 to 58.2) kilocalorie per capita daily increase in the supply of caloric sweeteners including HFCS. This change was not observed in the control groups, including Australia and the United Kingdom, as well as a composite control of 16 countries. Results were robust to placebo tests and additional sensitivity analyses.
Interpretation: NAFTA was strongly associated with a marked rise in HFCS supply and likely consumption in Canada. Our study provides evidence that even a seemingly modest change to product tariffs in free trade agreements can substantially alter population-wide dietary behaviour and exposure to risk factors.
© 2017 Canadian Medical Association or its licensors.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: None declared.
Figures


Comment in
-
Trade and public health.CMAJ. 2017 Jul 4;189(26):E879-E880. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.170089. CMAJ. 2017. PMID: 28676577 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- Bowles P. International trade and neoliberal globalism: towards re-peripheralisation in Australia, Canada and Mexico? Bowles P, Broomhill R, Gutiérrez-Haces T, et al., editors. London and New York: Routledge; 2008.
-
- Zahniser S, Angadjivand S, Hertz T, et al. NAFTA at 20: North America’s free-trade area and its impact on agriculture. Washington: United States Department of Agriculture; 2015.
-
- Hufbauer GC, Schott JJ. NAFTA: an assessment. Revised edition. Washington: Institute for International Economics; 1993.
-
- Wise C. The North American Free Trade Agreement. New Polit Econ 2009;14:133–48.
-
- Pearson DR. Toward free trade in sugar. In: Policy Analysis. No 768 Washinton: Cato Institute; 2015.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources