[Recovery of paraffin blocks and central archiving : Experiences of the Kiel lymph node registry and the German study group for Hodgkin lymphoma]
- PMID: 28676898
- DOI: 10.1007/s00292-017-0321-x
[Recovery of paraffin blocks and central archiving : Experiences of the Kiel lymph node registry and the German study group for Hodgkin lymphoma]
Abstract
Background: Central collection of tissue blocks for pathological and translational research is particularly important in rare diseases. Transfer of tissue blocks from primary to central pathology is of crucial importance.
Objectives: We aimed to answer the following questions: Has the transfer of tissue blocks sent for consultation or within clinical trials changed over the last 20 years? What are the reasons for reclaiming tissue blocks by the primary pathology and what actions would convince primary pathologists to leave the blocks in the reference pathology?
Material and methods: The first 100 biopsies of each year between 1995 and 2015 (n = 2100), as well as all tissue transfers within therapeutic studies (n = 1405, German Hodgkin Study Group, GHSG) between 1998 and 2015, were analyzed separately for block reclaims using the Department of Pathology database. A questionnaire evaluated the reasons for block reclaiming by the peripheral pathologists.
Results: There is a significant increase in block reclaims during the period analyzed among submissions for consultation as well as in clinical trials (linear regression, p = 0.0195 and p = 0.0107). The percentage of block reclaims does not differ between consultations and cases submitted upon request within clinical trials (p = 0.2404, t-test). A survey among pathologies that reclaim the block showed that their willingness to leave the block at the reference center would increase if the compatibility with accreditation guidelines (39.3%), a positive statement from professional associations (25%), or a formal confirmation of availability (53.6%) is provided.
Discussion: In particular, to improve research on rare diseases, it is desirable to point out the compatibility of central archiving in a designated center with accreditation guidelines.
Keywords: Archive; Reclaiming; Reference pathology; Second opinion; Translational research.
Similar articles
-
The development of quality assurance programs for radiotherapy within the German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG). Introduction, continuing work, and results of the radiotherapy reference panel.Strahlenther Onkol. 2005 Sep;181(9):557-66. doi: 10.1007/s00066-005-1437-0. Strahlenther Onkol. 2005. PMID: 16170482
-
Are there barriers to the release of paraffin blocks for clinical research trials? A College of American Pathologists survey of 609 laboratories.Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2011 Jul;135(7):870-3. doi: 10.5858/2010-0676-CP.1. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2011. PMID: 21732776
-
Can Cutting-Needle Biopsy Be an Alternative to Excisional Biopsy in Lymph Node Pathologies?Turk Patoloji Derg. 2017;1(1):235-239. doi: 10.5146/tjpath.2016.01393. Turk Patoloji Derg. 2017. PMID: 28832072 English.
-
Discordant lymphoma consisting of mediastinal large B-cell lymphoma and nodular sclerosis Hodgkin lymphoma in the right supraclavicular lymph nodes: a case report.Diagn Pathol. 2015 Dec 29;10:215. doi: 10.1186/s13000-015-0450-6. Diagn Pathol. 2015. PMID: 26715530 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Lymph node infarction and its association with lymphoma: a short series and literature review.N Z Med J. 2009 Feb 13;122(1289):40-4. N Z Med J. 2009. PMID: 19305448 Review.
References
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical