Retropubic versus transobturator MUS: time to revisit?

Affiliations

¹ Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Herlev Gentofte Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Herlev Ringvej, DK-2730, Herlev, Denmark. Gunnar.Lose@regionh.dk.
² Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Herlev Gentofte Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Herlev Ringvej, DK-2730, Herlev, Denmark.

Editorial

Gunnar Lose et al. Int Urogynecol J. 2017 Aug.

. 2017 Aug;28(8):1113-1114.

doi: 10.1007/s00192-017-3403-7. Epub 2017 Jul 4.

¹ Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Herlev Gentofte Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Herlev Ringvej, DK-2730, Herlev, Denmark. Gunnar.Lose@regionh.dk.
² Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Herlev Gentofte Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Herlev Ringvej, DK-2730, Herlev, Denmark.

No abstract available

Comment in

The retropubic sling more precisely restores the urethral closure mechanisms.
Petros P. Petros P. Int Urogynecol J. 2018 Jan;29(1):169-170. doi: 10.1007/s00192-017-3485-2. Epub 2017 Sep 25. Int Urogynecol J. 2018. PMID: 28948311 No abstract available.
Authors' reply to the comment by Petros et al. on "Retropubic versus transobturator MUS: Time to revisit?" by Lose and Klarskov.
Lose G, Klarskov N, Schaefer W. Lose G, et al. Int Urogynecol J. 2018 Jan;29(1):171. doi: 10.1007/s00192-017-3503-4. Epub 2017 Nov 6. Int Urogynecol J. 2018. PMID: 29110034 No abstract available.