Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017:21:16-142.
doi: 10.7812/TPP/16-142.

Body Mass Index and Mortality in a Very Large Cohort: Is It Really Healthier to Be Overweight?

Affiliations

Body Mass Index and Mortality in a Very Large Cohort: Is It Really Healthier to Be Overweight?

Arthur L Klatsky et al. Perm J. 2017.

Abstract

Context: Controversy persists about optimal body weight. Many experts define "normal" (healthy) body mass index (BMI) as 18.5 to 24.9 kg/m2, 25 to 29.9 kg/m2 as overweight, and 30 kg/m2 or greater as obese. Obesity is subdivided into 30 to 34.9 kg/m2 (Grade 1), 35 to 39.9 kg/m2 (Grade 2), and 40 kg/m2 and above (Grade 3). Studies consistently show higher mortality for underweight and Grade 2 or 3 obesity, but results conflict for the overweight category and Grade 1 obesity.

Objective: To study 30-year risk of death related to baseline BMI.

Design: Retrospective cohort study in a multiracial population of 273,843 persons using logistic regression with 7 covariates (sex, age, race-ethnicity, education, marital status, smoking, alcohol intake).

Main outcome measures: Mortality risk by baseline BMI.

Results: With average follow-up exceeding 30 years, there were 103,218 deaths: 41,215 attributed to cardiovascular causes and 62,003 to noncardiovascular causes. Odds ratios (and 95% confidence intervals) for all deaths in BMI categories, with a BMI of 18.5 to 24.9 kg/m2 as the referent, were BMI below 18.5 kg/m2 = 1.1 (1.0-2.0), BMI 25 to 29 kg/m2 = 1.1 (1.1-1.2), BMI 30 to 34 kg/m2 = 1.5 (1.4-1.5), BMI 35 to 39 kg/m2 = 2.1 (1.9-2.3), and BMI 40 kg/m2 or higher = 2.7 (2.4-3.0). Disparities existed regarding age, race/ethnicity, cause of death, and interval to death.

Conclusion: Compared with persons with BMI defined as normal, persons who were underweight, overweight, and obese were at increased risk of death over 30 years.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosure Statement

The author(s) have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Adjusted odds ratios (ORs) for deaths through 2012 according to body mass index (BMI, kg/m2) ascertained from 1964 to 1985 (BMI referent = 18.5–24.9 kg/m2). Number of deaths in rounded thousands (K) are in parentheses. Analysis was by logistic regression models with age, sex, race, education, smoking (Smk), and alcohol. CV = cardiovascular

References

    1. McGee DL Diverse Populations Collaboration. Body mass index and mortality: A meta-analysis based on person-level data from twenty-six observational studies. Ann Epidemiol. 2005 Feb;15(2):87–97. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annepidem.2004.05.012. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Huxley R, Mendis S, Zheleznyakov E, Reddy S, Chan J. Body mass index, waist circumference and waist:hip ratio as predictors of cardiovascular risk—a review of the literature. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2010 Jan;64(1):16–22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ejcn.2009.68. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mehta NK, Chang VW. Secular declines in the association between obesity and mortality in the United States. Popul Dev Rev. 2011;37(3):435–51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2011.00429.x. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Flegal KM, Kit BK, Orpana H, Graubard BI. Association of all-cause mortality with overweight and obesity using standard body mass index categories: A systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2013 Jan 2;309(1):71–82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2012.113905. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Heymsfield SB, Cefalu WT. Does body mass index adequately convey a patient’s mortality risk? JAMA. 2013 Jan 2;309(1):87–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2012.185445. Erratum in: JAMA 2013 Feb 6;309(5):442. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2013.15. - DOI - DOI - PubMed